Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 6, 140 - 151, 01.11.2023
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.93.10.6

Öz

Kaynakça

  • AbuJarour, S. and Krasnova, H. (2017). Understanding the Role of ICTs in Promoting Social Inclusion: The Case of Syrian Refugees in Germany. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2017). Guimarães, Portugal.
  • Alencar, A. (2020). Mobile communication and refugees: An analytical review of academic literature. Sociology Compass, 14(8), e12802.
  • Alter, L. (2021). People Are Outraged to See Refugees With Smartphones. They Shouldn’t Be, Available from: https://www.treehugger.com/people-are-outraged-see-refugees-smartphonesthey-shouldnt-be-4867591, Retrieved on 08.05.2023.
  • Artut, S. (2014). Technology-Human Togetherness, Istanbul: Ayrıntı Publications.
  • Baltacı, A. (2017). Miles-Huberman model in qualitative data analysis. Ahi Evran University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-15.
  • Biner, Ö. and Soykan, C. (2016). Life in Türkiye from the Perspective of Syrian Refugees, Diversity and Strategic Litigation Network Project.
  • Cengiz, D., Özgür, E. M., and Yıldız, S. (2018). Everyday Life Practices of Syrian Refugees in Antakya. TÜCAUM 30th Anniversary International Geography Symposium, 232-238.
  • Çelik, M. Y., Şen, A. T., Hasan, U., and Usta, S. E. (2018). Migration/Refugee Policy of the European Union and Economic, Social and Public Communication Problems of Asylum Seekers: The Case of Kastamonu. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (57), 296-315.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Akbaşlı, S., and Durnalı, M. (2018). Adaptation of the Motivation to Access Digital Technologies Scale into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(4), 75-88 . DOI: 10.19126/suje.431126
  • Kaufmann, K. ( 2018). Sailing to a new life: Syrian refugees and their smartphones in Vienna. Information, Communication and Society, 21 ( 6 ), 882 - 898 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.14372
  • Koç Akgül, S., Pazarbaşı, B., and Birinci, M. (2018). Internet and Social Media Use in the Refugee Crisis in Türkiye: A Comparative Analysis of Websites Related to Syrian Refugees. Journal of Communication Research in Türkiye, (31) , 153-167 DOI: 10.17829/turcom.41
  • Latonero, M. and Kift, P. (2018). On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. Social Media+ Society,4 (1), 2056305118764432.
  • Maigret, E. (2013). Media and Communication Sociology, Halime Yücel (trans.), Istanbul: İletişim Pub.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mert Susever, D. (2021). Functionality of translation websites and tools for refugees (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Sakarya University Institute of Social Sciences.
  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis (Second edition). California: SAGE Publications Inc.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2012). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (Volume I-II). (Translated by Sedef Özge) Istanbul: Yayın Odası.
  • Norris, P. (2001). Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and The Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • OECD (Organisation For Economic Cooperation and Development) (2001). Understanding the digital divide, http://www.oecd.org, (Access Date: 10.05.2023).
  • Reynolds, D., Treharne, D. and Tripp, H. (2003). “ICT—The Hopes and the Reality.” British Journal of Educational Technology. 34: 151–167.
  • Ros, A., Gonzalez, E., Marin, A., and Sow, P. (2007). Migration and information flows: A new lens for the study of contemporary international migration. Barcelona: Internet Interdisciplinary Institute.
  • Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M. and Bernstein, M. (2018). Development of an instrument to measure Faculty’s information and communication technology access (FICTA). Education and Information Technologies, 23, 253-269.
  • Tağ Kalafatoğlu, Ş. (2022). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in the Lives of Refugees and Migrants. İşman, A., Özgür, A. Z., Adıgüzel, Y., Çötok, N. A., and Çiftçi, D. (Eds.) Communication Studies 2022 (pp. 195-206).
  • Trauth, E.M. and Howcroft, D. (2006). “Social Inclusion and the Information Systems Field: Why Now?” In Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems. pp. 3-12. Springer US.
  • Van Dijk, J. (2016). Network society (Ö. Sakin, Translation). Kafka, Epsilon Publishing.
  • Yazıcı, L. and Ağar, M. (2018). Investigation of Refugee Internal Attitudes Towards Technology: Tokat Case. Journal of Scientific Research in Türkiye, 3(1), 83-92. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tubad/issue/52293/684259
  • Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. (Expanded 9th edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Digital Lives of Refugees: Their Use of ICTs in Türkiye

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 6, 140 - 151, 01.11.2023
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.93.10.6

Öz

Arguably amongst the ways refugees can adapt to the society they migrate to is their knowledge and competence in the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). One of the ways that refugees who had to migrate from their countries due to compulsory reasons could make their lives easier in the country they migrated to was the use of The Internet with the developing technology. In this study conducted to investigate the digital lives of refugees in Türkiye, purposive sampling was used, and data were collected from the study group through an open-ended questionnaire. 14 participants participated in the open-ended questionnaire and the data were collected face-to-face. The data collected from the participants through open-ended questionnaires were analyzed using the content analysis technique. As a result of the study, it was found that digital technologies facilitate the lives of refugees in Türkiye. According to the results obtained from the research findings, it was found that all of the refugees have internet access, they use ICTs in their daily lives for communication and for keeping in touch with family and friends, and they want to improve themselves in ICT use. Based on these findings, the use of ICTs by refugees emerges as a situation in which they want to facilitate their life in Türkiye.

Kaynakça

  • AbuJarour, S. and Krasnova, H. (2017). Understanding the Role of ICTs in Promoting Social Inclusion: The Case of Syrian Refugees in Germany. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2017). Guimarães, Portugal.
  • Alencar, A. (2020). Mobile communication and refugees: An analytical review of academic literature. Sociology Compass, 14(8), e12802.
  • Alter, L. (2021). People Are Outraged to See Refugees With Smartphones. They Shouldn’t Be, Available from: https://www.treehugger.com/people-are-outraged-see-refugees-smartphonesthey-shouldnt-be-4867591, Retrieved on 08.05.2023.
  • Artut, S. (2014). Technology-Human Togetherness, Istanbul: Ayrıntı Publications.
  • Baltacı, A. (2017). Miles-Huberman model in qualitative data analysis. Ahi Evran University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-15.
  • Biner, Ö. and Soykan, C. (2016). Life in Türkiye from the Perspective of Syrian Refugees, Diversity and Strategic Litigation Network Project.
  • Cengiz, D., Özgür, E. M., and Yıldız, S. (2018). Everyday Life Practices of Syrian Refugees in Antakya. TÜCAUM 30th Anniversary International Geography Symposium, 232-238.
  • Çelik, M. Y., Şen, A. T., Hasan, U., and Usta, S. E. (2018). Migration/Refugee Policy of the European Union and Economic, Social and Public Communication Problems of Asylum Seekers: The Case of Kastamonu. Dumlupınar University Journal of Social Sciences, (57), 296-315.
  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Akbaşlı, S., and Durnalı, M. (2018). Adaptation of the Motivation to Access Digital Technologies Scale into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(4), 75-88 . DOI: 10.19126/suje.431126
  • Kaufmann, K. ( 2018). Sailing to a new life: Syrian refugees and their smartphones in Vienna. Information, Communication and Society, 21 ( 6 ), 882 - 898 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.14372
  • Koç Akgül, S., Pazarbaşı, B., and Birinci, M. (2018). Internet and Social Media Use in the Refugee Crisis in Türkiye: A Comparative Analysis of Websites Related to Syrian Refugees. Journal of Communication Research in Türkiye, (31) , 153-167 DOI: 10.17829/turcom.41
  • Latonero, M. and Kift, P. (2018). On digital passages and borders: Refugees and the new infrastructure for movement and control. Social Media+ Society,4 (1), 2056305118764432.
  • Maigret, E. (2013). Media and Communication Sociology, Halime Yücel (trans.), Istanbul: İletişim Pub.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Mert Susever, D. (2021). Functionality of translation websites and tools for refugees (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Sakarya University Institute of Social Sciences.
  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis (Second edition). California: SAGE Publications Inc.
  • Neuman, W. L. (2012). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (Volume I-II). (Translated by Sedef Özge) Istanbul: Yayın Odası.
  • Norris, P. (2001). Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and The Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • OECD (Organisation For Economic Cooperation and Development) (2001). Understanding the digital divide, http://www.oecd.org, (Access Date: 10.05.2023).
  • Reynolds, D., Treharne, D. and Tripp, H. (2003). “ICT—The Hopes and the Reality.” British Journal of Educational Technology. 34: 151–167.
  • Ros, A., Gonzalez, E., Marin, A., and Sow, P. (2007). Migration and information flows: A new lens for the study of contemporary international migration. Barcelona: Internet Interdisciplinary Institute.
  • Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M. and Bernstein, M. (2018). Development of an instrument to measure Faculty’s information and communication technology access (FICTA). Education and Information Technologies, 23, 253-269.
  • Tağ Kalafatoğlu, Ş. (2022). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in the Lives of Refugees and Migrants. İşman, A., Özgür, A. Z., Adıgüzel, Y., Çötok, N. A., and Çiftçi, D. (Eds.) Communication Studies 2022 (pp. 195-206).
  • Trauth, E.M. and Howcroft, D. (2006). “Social Inclusion and the Information Systems Field: Why Now?” In Social Inclusion: Societal and Organizational Implications for Information Systems. pp. 3-12. Springer US.
  • Van Dijk, J. (2016). Network society (Ö. Sakin, Translation). Kafka, Epsilon Publishing.
  • Yazıcı, L. and Ağar, M. (2018). Investigation of Refugee Internal Attitudes Towards Technology: Tokat Case. Journal of Scientific Research in Türkiye, 3(1), 83-92. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tubad/issue/52293/684259
  • Yıldırım, A. and Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. (Expanded 9th edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
Toplam 27 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Bilgi Sistemleri Eğitimi
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Elif Atabay 0000-0002-4545-8926

Adile Aşkım Kurt 0000-0003-1084-5579

Ferhan Odabaşı 0000-0003-4362-4609

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 3 Kasım 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Kasım 2023
Kabul Tarihi 13 Eylül 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 6

Kaynak Göster

APA Atabay, E., Kurt, A. A., & Odabaşı, F. (2023). Digital Lives of Refugees: Their Use of ICTs in Türkiye. Participatory Educational Research, 10(6), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.93.10.6