Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Eğitim Teknolojileri: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 57 - EBD 57. Sayı, 60 - 90, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.1148289

Öz

Eğitim teknolojisi, zaman içindeki gelişimin takip edilebilmesi için geniş kapsamlı analizler gerektiren kapsamlı bir içeriğe ve konu birikimine sahiptir. Kapsamlı analizlerin yapılması, o alandaki eksikliklerin olduğu yerlere odaklanılmasının kolaylaştırmanın yanı sıra öznel deneyimler yerine çoğul bir bakış açısının edinilmesini kolaylaştırmaktadır. Bu araştırmada, eğitim teknolojileri alanındaki araştırmaların genel eğilimlerinin belirlenmesi ve zaman içindeki gelişiminin takip edilebilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Eğitim teknolojisi araştırmaları yıl, yayın türü, ülke, dergi, kurum, yazar, bilim alanı, anahtar kelime, ülkeler arası ilişki, atıf, etkileşim vb. açılardan bibliyometrik yöntemle incelenmiştir. EdTech Journals 2021 listesinde ve SCOPUS veri tabanında eğitim teknolojileri alanında yer alan 156 dergideki 1950-2021 yılları aralığında yayınlanan 135,835 yayın üzerinden analizler gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları eğitim teknolojisi araştırmalarının yıllara göre sayısal gelişimi, içerikleri bakımından değişimi, araştırmalar arasındaki ilişki ve araştırmaların etkileri olmak üzere dört başlıkta sunulmuştur. Eğitim teknolojileri araştırmalarında 2000 yılından sonra yayın sayısının arttığı, akademik çalışmaların büyük bölümünü makalelerin oluşturduğu, ülke sıralamasında ve ortak yazar analizlerinde Amerika’nın öne çıktığı, en çok sosyal bilimler ve bilgisayar bilimleri konu alanlarında çalışmalar yapıldığı görülmüştür. Ortak kelime analizleri incelendiğinde ise etkileşimli öğrenme ortamları, öğrenme-öğretme stratejileri, pedagojik konular, sanal gerçeklik ve uzaktan eğitim konularının ön plana çıkmıştır. Eğitim teknolojisi alanındaki araştırmalarda en çok atıf alan dergiler Computers in Human Behavior, Computers And Education ve Journal Of Computer-Mediated Communication dergileri; en çok atıf yapılan kurum ise Michigan State Üniversitesi olmuştur. Eğitim teknolojisi alanında yapılan araştırmaların sayısal, içeriksel ve etkisel eğilimlerinin değerlendirildiği bu çalışmanın, alanda yapılacak araştırmalar için oluşturacağı zemin açısından katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Destekleyen Kurum

İLKE - İlim Kültür Eğitim Vakfı

Kaynakça

  • Alkan, C. (1997). Eğitim teknolojisi (5th ed.). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Berrocoso, J., Arroyo, M., Videla, C., & Cevallos, M. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 1–23.
  • Bodily, R., Leary, H., & West, R. E. (2019). Research trends in instructional design and technology journals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12712
  • Bower, M. (2017). Technology integration as an educational imperative. In Design of Technology-Enhanced Learning. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-182-720171001
  • Bozkurt, A., Hamutoğlu, N. B., KABAN, A. L., TAŞÇI, G., & Aykul, M. (2021). Dijital bilgi çağı: Dijital toplum, dijital dönüşüm, dijital eğitim ve dijital yeterlilikler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 35-63. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.911584
  • Caffarella, E. P. (1999). The major themes and trends in doctoral dissertation research in educational technology from 1977 through 1998. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED436178
  • Cheng, Y. P., Huang, C. H., & Hsu, L. C. (2022). Research Trends in Educational Technology: A Review of Studies Published in Five Social Science Citation Indexed Journals From 2010 to 2019. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 18(1), 1-14. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/article/full-text-html/293191 EdTech Journals. (2021). EdTech Journals. Retrieved from: https://www.edtechjournals.org/
  • Educause. (2022a). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report | Teaching and Learning Edition. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2022/4/2022hrteachinglearning.pdf
  • Educause. (2022b). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report | Information Security Edition. https://library.educause.edu/-media/files/library/2021/2/2021_horizon_report_infosec.pdf
  • Gunes, U. (2022). Bibliometric database. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/33YMFCJ
  • Higgins, J. C., Sr. (2019). Embedding educational technologies in early years education.Research in Learning Technology, 27(0). Advance online publication. 10.25304/rlt.v27.2033
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12. Retrieved from: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/104648
  • Keshaval, G. AG & Gowda, MP (2008). ACM transaction on information systems (1989–2006): a bibliometric study. Information Studies, 14(4), 223–234. Retrieved from: http://ischolar.info/index.php/IS/article/view/185476
  • Kimmons, R., Rosenberg, J., & Allman, B. (2021). Trends in educational technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus can tell us about current research and practice. TechTrends, 65, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6
  • Lai, J. W., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27–42. 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
  • Lin, T. J., Lin, T. C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1550274
  • Livari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102183. c
  • Pedro, L. F. M. G., Barbosa, C. M. M. D. O., & Santos, C. M. D. N. (2018). A critical review of mobile learning integration in formal educational contexts. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-018-0091-4
  • Richey, R. C. (2008). Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. Tech Trends, 52(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0108-2
  • Scanlon, E. (2021). Educational technology research: Contexts, complexity and challenges. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1): 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.580
  • Schneider, D. (2009). Educational technology. Retrieved from: http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/EduTech_Wiki:About
  • Sonnenberg, L. K., Onan, A., & Archibald, D. (2021). Educational technology competency framework: Defining a community of practice across Canada. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(1), n1. Retrieved from: https://cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/27943/20535
  • Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Becit, G., Kiliçer, K., Akbulut, Y., & Yildirim, Y. (2008). Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştirmalarinda güncel eğilimler. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 439–458. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1723975
  • Şumuer, E. & Yıldırım, S. (2018). Öğretim teknolojisinin tarihsel gelişimi. In A. A. Kurt (Ed.), Öğretim teknolojilerinin Temelleri (pp. 17–42). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • United States Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. Retrieved from: https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
  • Qin, J., Rhee, B. Van Der, Venkataraman, V., & Ahmadi, T. (2021). The impact of IT infrastructure capability on NPD performance: The roles of market knowledge and innovation process formality. Journal of Business Research, 133(April), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.072
  • Wilson, B. G. (2012). Constructivism in practical and historical context. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 3, 45–52. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/3GhWDwG
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2020a). 2020 - Human development reports. Author. Retrieved from: https://hdr.undp.org/en/data
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2020b). 2020 - Human development reports / dimension: Education. Author. Retrieved from https://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/103706#
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2022). 2022 special report - New threats to human security in the Anthropocene: Demanding greater solidarity. Author. Retrieved from: https://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/srhs2022.pdf
  • Wikipedia. (2022). G20. Retrieved from: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G20

Educational Technology: A Bibliometric Approach

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 57 - EBD 57. Sayı, 60 - 90, 31.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.1148289

Öz

Educational technology (EdTech) possesses comprehensive content and an accumulation of topics requiring extensive analyses for monitoring its development over time. Conducting comprehensive analyses facilitates acquiring a plural perspective instead of subjective experiences and facilitates focusing on the places where deficiencies occur in the field. This research aims to determine general EdTech research trends and to monitor its developments over time and investigates EdTech research from aspects such as year, publication type, country, journal, institution, author, scientific field, keywords, inter-country relationships, citations, and interactions using the bibliometric method. The study analyzes 135,835 EdTech publications published between 1950-2021 in 156 journals located in the EdTech Journals 2021 list and Scopus database and presents the findings under four headings: numerical development of EdTech research by year, content changes, relationships among the research, and research impact. The number of publications on EdTech research increased post-2000, with most being performed in the fields of social sciences and computer sciences, a large portion are composed of articles, and USA is prominent in the country rankings and coauthor analyses. When examining the common word analyses, the topics of interactive learning environments, learning-teaching strategies, pedagogical issues, virtual reality, and distance learning are prominent. The most-cited journals in EdTech research are Computers and Human Behavior, Computers and Education, and Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. This study evaluates EdTech research’s numerical, contextual, and impact trends and is thought to contribute to the framework formed for future EdTech research.

Kaynakça

  • Alkan, C. (1997). Eğitim teknolojisi (5th ed.). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Berrocoso, J., Arroyo, M., Videla, C., & Cevallos, M. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 1–23.
  • Bodily, R., Leary, H., & West, R. E. (2019). Research trends in instructional design and technology journals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12712
  • Bower, M. (2017). Technology integration as an educational imperative. In Design of Technology-Enhanced Learning. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-182-720171001
  • Bozkurt, A., Hamutoğlu, N. B., KABAN, A. L., TAŞÇI, G., & Aykul, M. (2021). Dijital bilgi çağı: Dijital toplum, dijital dönüşüm, dijital eğitim ve dijital yeterlilikler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 35-63. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.911584
  • Caffarella, E. P. (1999). The major themes and trends in doctoral dissertation research in educational technology from 1977 through 1998. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED436178
  • Cheng, Y. P., Huang, C. H., & Hsu, L. C. (2022). Research Trends in Educational Technology: A Review of Studies Published in Five Social Science Citation Indexed Journals From 2010 to 2019. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 18(1), 1-14. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/article/full-text-html/293191 EdTech Journals. (2021). EdTech Journals. Retrieved from: https://www.edtechjournals.org/
  • Educause. (2022a). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report | Teaching and Learning Edition. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2022/4/2022hrteachinglearning.pdf
  • Educause. (2022b). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report | Information Security Edition. https://library.educause.edu/-media/files/library/2021/2/2021_horizon_report_infosec.pdf
  • Gunes, U. (2022). Bibliometric database. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/33YMFCJ
  • Higgins, J. C., Sr. (2019). Embedding educational technologies in early years education.Research in Learning Technology, 27(0). Advance online publication. 10.25304/rlt.v27.2033
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1–12. Retrieved from: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/104648
  • Keshaval, G. AG & Gowda, MP (2008). ACM transaction on information systems (1989–2006): a bibliometric study. Information Studies, 14(4), 223–234. Retrieved from: http://ischolar.info/index.php/IS/article/view/185476
  • Kimmons, R., Rosenberg, J., & Allman, B. (2021). Trends in educational technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus can tell us about current research and practice. TechTrends, 65, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00589-6
  • Lai, J. W., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 133, 27–42. 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
  • Lin, T. J., Lin, T. C., Potvin, P., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Research trends in science education from 2013 to 2017: A systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1550274
  • Livari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life–How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102183. c
  • Pedro, L. F. M. G., Barbosa, C. M. M. D. O., & Santos, C. M. D. N. (2018). A critical review of mobile learning integration in formal educational contexts. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-15. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-018-0091-4
  • Richey, R. C. (2008). Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. Tech Trends, 52(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-008-0108-2
  • Scanlon, E. (2021). Educational technology research: Contexts, complexity and challenges. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1): 2, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.580
  • Schneider, D. (2009). Educational technology. Retrieved from: http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/EduTech_Wiki:About
  • Sonnenberg, L. K., Onan, A., & Archibald, D. (2021). Educational technology competency framework: Defining a community of practice across Canada. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 47(1), n1. Retrieved from: https://cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/27943/20535
  • Şimşek, A., Özdamar, N., Becit, G., Kiliçer, K., Akbulut, Y., & Yildirim, Y. (2008). Türkiye’deki eğitim teknolojisi araştirmalarinda güncel eğilimler. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, 439–458. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1723975
  • Şumuer, E. & Yıldırım, S. (2018). Öğretim teknolojisinin tarihsel gelişimi. In A. A. Kurt (Ed.), Öğretim teknolojilerinin Temelleri (pp. 17–42). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • United States Department of Education. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. Retrieved from: https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
  • Qin, J., Rhee, B. Van Der, Venkataraman, V., & Ahmadi, T. (2021). The impact of IT infrastructure capability on NPD performance: The roles of market knowledge and innovation process formality. Journal of Business Research, 133(April), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.072
  • Wilson, B. G. (2012). Constructivism in practical and historical context. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 3, 45–52. Retrieved from: https://bit.ly/3GhWDwG
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2020a). 2020 - Human development reports. Author. Retrieved from: https://hdr.undp.org/en/data
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2020b). 2020 - Human development reports / dimension: Education. Author. Retrieved from https://hdr.undp.org/en/indicators/103706#
  • United Nations Development Programme. (2022). 2022 special report - New threats to human security in the Anthropocene: Demanding greater solidarity. Author. Retrieved from: https://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/srhs2022.pdf
  • Wikipedia. (2022). G20. Retrieved from: https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/G20
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Umit Gunes 0000-0001-6942-6403

Betül Tonbuloğlu 0000-0003-1542-2380

İsmail Tonbuloğlu 0000-0001-7059-9125

Kevser Yıldırım 0000-0003-2237-9739

İbrahim Hakan Karataş 0000-0001-5569-014X

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 25 Ocak 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2023
Kabul Tarihi 5 Ekim 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 57 - EBD 57. Sayı

Kaynak Göster

APA Gunes, U., Tonbuloğlu, B., Tonbuloğlu, İ., Yıldırım, K., vd. (2023). Educational Technology: A Bibliometric Approach. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 57(57), 60-90. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.1148289