Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Evaluation Of Physical Education Teachers' Opinions About Course Duration And Hours In Schools

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 60 - 67, 30.06.2021
https://doi.org/10.52974/jena.938358

Öz

One of the biggest goals of the education system is to increase student success academically. There are many factors that affect student success. One of these is the course hours and duration. Therefore, teachers' attitudes towards the duration and hours of the lessons are very important for the lessons to be efficient and useful. The aim of this study is to evaluate the opinions of physical education teachers about the course time and hours in schools. The research is a qualitative study. The study group of the research consists of 20 physical education teachers and this study group was determined by the maximum diversity sampling method. In the study group of the study, face-to-face interview technique was used with 20 physical education teachers within the Iğdır Provincial Directorate of National Education, on a voluntary basis. In the study, the data obtained by using the interview method, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was analyzed with the content analysis method. As a result of the research, physical education teachers stated that the duration of the lesson was sufficient, but it should be increased according to the grade level or adjusted according to the teacher. It was stated that the duration of the physical education teachers participating in the study should be adjusted by considering the developmental characteristics of the students. In addition, while the research group stated that the daily class hours were sufficient, it was concluded that the daily course hours of some teachers were insufficient and should be increased.

Kaynakça

  • Akıncı, B., Uzun, N. ve Kışoğlu, M. (2015). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin meslekte karşılaştıkları problemler ve fen öğretiminde yaşadıkları zorluklar. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 1189-1215.
  • Ayvacı, H.Ş., Durmuş, A. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin mesleklerinin ilk yıllarında karşılaştıkları sorunlar ve bu sorunların yıllara göre değişimi. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 29-44.
  • Balbağ, M.Z., Karaer, G. (2017). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin fen öğretiminde karşılaştıkları sorunlar. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1): 28-46.
  • Ban, J. R. (1993). Parents assuring student success: Achievement made easy by learning together. Solution Tree.
  • Benavot, A. (2004). A global study of intended instructional time and official school curricula, 1980- 2000: Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005, The Quality Imperative. IBE.
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1991). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Çaycı, B. (2018). İlkokullardaki ders süresi ve ders saatlerinin sınıf öğretmeni görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 3(5), 117-131.
  • Demirtaş, H. (2005). Sınıf yönetiminin temelleri. İçinde Hüseyin Kıran. (Ed.), Etkili sınıf yönetimi (ss.1-34). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Doğan, Y. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji dersi programının uygulanması sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 86-106.
  • Gall, M. D. Gall, J. P., Jacobsen. D. R., & Bullock, T. L. (1990). Tools for learning: A guide to teaching study skills. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Gay, L., Mills, G., Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Gökçe, F. (2012). Öğretmen ve velilerin, öğrencilerin okulda geçirdikleri zaman, ders ve dinlenme süreleri ile tatiller ve okul dönemleri konusundaki görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(4), 2541-2560.
  • Kıncal, R.Y.ve Salih Zeki G. (2002). İlköğretimde teneffüsün yeri ve önemi. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Anı Yayıncılık), 9, 86-94.
  • Leonard, L. J. (2001, November 14-16). Erosion of ınstructional time: Teacher concerns. (Paper presentation). Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association (MSERA), Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Mülayim, H. ve Soran, H. (2002). Lise 1 biyoloji ders kitapları ve haftalık ders saatleri hakkında öğrenci, öğretmen ve okul yöneticilerinin görüş ve önerileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 185-197.
  • Rivkin, S. G., & Schiman, J. C. (2013). Instruction time, classroom quality, and academic achievement. Nber Working Paper Series, Natıonal Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. Baskı). Seçkin Yayınevi.

Evaluation Of Physical Education Teachers' Opinions About Course Duration And Hours In Schools

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 60 - 67, 30.06.2021
https://doi.org/10.52974/jena.938358

Öz

One of the biggest goals of the education system is to increase student success academically. There are many factors that affect student success. One of these is the course hours and duration. Therefore, teachers' attitudes towards the duration and hours of the lessons are very important for the lessons to be efficient and useful. The aim of this study is to evaluate the opinions of physical education teachers about the course time and hours in schools. The research is a qualitative study. The study group of the research consists of 20 physical education teachers and this study group was determined by the maximum diversity sampling method. In the study group of the study, face-to-face interview technique was used with 20 physical education teachers within the Iğdır Provincial Directorate of National Education, on a voluntary basis. In the study, the data obtained by using the interview method, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was analyzed with the content analysis method. As a result of the research, physical education teachers stated that the duration of the lesson was sufficient, but it should be increased according to the grade level or adjusted according to the teacher. It was stated that the duration of the physical education teachers participating in the study should be adjusted by considering the developmental characteristics of the students. In addition, while the research group stated that the daily class hours were sufficient, it was concluded that the daily course hours of some teachers were insufficient and should be increased.

Kaynakça

  • Akıncı, B., Uzun, N. ve Kışoğlu, M. (2015). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin meslekte karşılaştıkları problemler ve fen öğretiminde yaşadıkları zorluklar. International Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 1189-1215.
  • Ayvacı, H.Ş., Durmuş, A. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin mesleklerinin ilk yıllarında karşılaştıkları sorunlar ve bu sorunların yıllara göre değişimi. Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1), 29-44.
  • Balbağ, M.Z., Karaer, G. (2017). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin fen öğretiminde karşılaştıkları sorunlar. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1): 28-46.
  • Ban, J. R. (1993). Parents assuring student success: Achievement made easy by learning together. Solution Tree.
  • Benavot, A. (2004). A global study of intended instructional time and official school curricula, 1980- 2000: Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005, The Quality Imperative. IBE.
  • Bursalıoğlu, Z. (1991). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Çaycı, B. (2018). İlkokullardaki ders süresi ve ders saatlerinin sınıf öğretmeni görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 3(5), 117-131.
  • Demirtaş, H. (2005). Sınıf yönetiminin temelleri. İçinde Hüseyin Kıran. (Ed.), Etkili sınıf yönetimi (ss.1-34). Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Doğan, Y. (2010). Fen ve teknoloji dersi programının uygulanması sürecinde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 86-106.
  • Gall, M. D. Gall, J. P., Jacobsen. D. R., & Bullock, T. L. (1990). Tools for learning: A guide to teaching study skills. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Gay, L., Mills, G., Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.
  • Gökçe, F. (2012). Öğretmen ve velilerin, öğrencilerin okulda geçirdikleri zaman, ders ve dinlenme süreleri ile tatiller ve okul dönemleri konusundaki görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(4), 2541-2560.
  • Kıncal, R.Y.ve Salih Zeki G. (2002). İlköğretimde teneffüsün yeri ve önemi. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Anı Yayıncılık), 9, 86-94.
  • Leonard, L. J. (2001, November 14-16). Erosion of ınstructional time: Teacher concerns. (Paper presentation). Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association (MSERA), Little Rock, Arkansas.
  • Mülayim, H. ve Soran, H. (2002). Lise 1 biyoloji ders kitapları ve haftalık ders saatleri hakkında öğrenci, öğretmen ve okul yöneticilerinin görüş ve önerileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 185-197.
  • Rivkin, S. G., & Schiman, J. C. (2013). Instruction time, classroom quality, and academic achievement. Nber Working Paper Series, Natıonal Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355.
  • Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9. Baskı). Seçkin Yayınevi.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Alan Eğitimleri
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ahmet Yıkılmaz 0000-0001-7999-7875

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Yıkılmaz, A. (2021). Evaluation Of Physical Education Teachers’ Opinions About Course Duration And Hours In Schools. Journal of Education and New Approaches, 4(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.52974/jena.938358

Flag Counter