Araştırma Makalesi
Yıl 2021,
Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 116 - 124, 01.07.2021
Öz
Kaynakça
- Anonymous, (2021). FAO. https:// www. fao. org/ faostat/
- Amir Y, Haenni A L and Youyou A, (2006). Differences in the biochemical composition of dry legumes cultivated in North Algeria. EJEAFChe, 5(3); 1411-1418.
- Amini A, Ghannadha M and Abd-Mishani C, (2002). Genetic diversity and correlation between different traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian J. of Agricultural Sci., 33(4), 605-615.
- Anlarsal AE, Yücel C, Özveren D, (1999). A study to identify the parameters of yield and yield components for Chickpea in Eastern Mediterranean region. Turkish Field Crop Congress Third edition (Forage Crops and Edible Grain Legumes), pp:342- 347,15-18 November, Adana.
- Atmaca E, (2008). A study to identify the effect of different sowing date and density on the chickpea yield and quality paramaters under Eskişehir conditions, PhD Thesis, 90 s., Ankara
- Babagil GE, (2011). Investigating the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties for yield and yield paramaters in ecological conditions of Erzurum. Anatolia Agricultural Journal, 26(2):122- 127.
- Bakoğlu A, (2009). A study to investigate the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties for yield and yield paramaters in ecological conditions of Elazığ. Harran University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty. 13(1):1-6.
- Bayraktar H, Dolar FS and Tör M, (2007). Determination of genetic diversity within Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr., the cause of Ascochyta blight of chickpea in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology 89(3):341-347.
- Cin ST, Topal N, (2021); Determination of some quality characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes and relationships between characteristics, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(1): 130-136.
- Erdemci İ, Yaşar M, Koç M, (2016). Evaluation of selection criteria i̇n winter chickpea using correlation coefficient and path analysis. YYU Tar. Bil. Derg. (YYU J Agr. Sci.), 26(1):1-6 Gül MK, Egesel CÖ, Kahrıman F, Tayyar Ş, (2006). Potentiality to grow winter chickpea in Çanakkale region. Uludag University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 20(1):57-66
- Kahraman A, Ceyhan E, Harmankaya M, (2015). Nutritional variation and drought tolerance in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Elem., 20(2): 331-341.DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.67
- Kaiser W J and Kusmenoglu I, (1997). Distribution of mating types and the teleomorph of Ascochyta rabiei on chickpea in Turkey. Plant Disease 81:1284-1287.
- Kalefetoğlu Macar T and Ekmekçi Y, (2009). Alterations in photochemical and physiological activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under drought stress, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(5):335-346.
- Mart D, (2006). Investigation of relations among ascochyta blight and plant morphology with multi-regression on winter planted chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties in the Çukurova region, Ascochyta, 2-6 July 2006, Le Tronchet, France.
- Mart D, Çinkaya N, Karaköy T and Keçeli A, (2010), Adaptation of registered chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to Çukurova region and investigation of quality values in regional conditions, Book Abstracts, 5th International food legumes research conference (IFLRCV) and 7th European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEP VII); Legumes For Global Health Legume Crops And Products For Food, Feed And Environmental Benefits, April 26-30, 2010-Antalya.
- Mart D, Yücel D, Türkeri M, (2015). Evaluation of yield and morphological characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes at winter sowing time in Çukurova region, Turkey XI. Field Plants Congress, Canakkale, 19-23 September, 2015.
- Özer S, Karaköy T, Toklu F, Baloch F, Kilian B, Özkan H, (2010). Nutritional and physicochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica, 175(2): 237-249.
- Poniedziaek M, Sekara A, Ciura J, Jedrszczyk E, (2006). The effect of sowing times and locality on yield and seed quality of two chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Katedra Warzywnictwa Z Ekonomika Ogrodnictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Al. 29-Listopada 54, 31-425 Kraków, Poland.
- Sozen O and Karadavut U, (2018). Correlation and path analysis for yield performance and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes cultivated in Central Anatolia. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 50(2), 625-63
- Srivastava AK, Dixit GP, Mohammad Nisar N and Singh P, (2020). Genetic variability and interrelationships among grain physical and hydration traits in chickpea. Legume Research-An International Journal, DOI: 10.18805/LR-4407
- Slim SN, Saxena MC, (1993). Adaptation of springsown chickpea to the Mediterranean basin. II. factors influencing yield under drought, Field Crops Research, 34:137-146.
- Şehirali S, (1988). Food Legumes, Ankara Üni. Faculty of Agricultural Publications, 1089, Ankara, 435 s.
- Toğay N, Toğay Y and Çiftçi V, (2001). A study to identify the hydration capacity and the ratio of hard seed coat for Turkish chickpea varieties. Turkey Congress of Field Crops-IV Edition, 17-21 September 2001, 377-379. Tekirdağ.
- Ton A and Anlarsal AE, (2016). Determining correlation analysis and agro-morphological traits of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in Mediterranean climate conditions. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, 30:383-391.
Evaluation of Morphological, Quality and Yield Characteristics of Some Registered Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties in The Eastern-Mediterranean Region
Öz
This research was conducted to evaluate regional adaptation of registered chickpea varieties, their yield and some yield
related characteristics observed at trial fields under winter growth conditions in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey
in Adana location during 2014 and 2015. Trials were conducted in fields of Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research
Institute. In this study, 17 registered varieties and 3 control varieties in total 20 varieties were tested in trials. During this
study, the varieties were evaluated in Adana location for their fitness to winter growth conditions.
The highest and the lowest yield resulted in 2014 for Adana location were 3.94 t/ha and 1.76 t/ha for Trial, and respectively.
In 2015, the highest and the lowest yield resulted for Adana location were 5.08 t/ha and 0.17 t/ha for Trial, respectively.
In terms of quality values for both growing seasons of 2014 and 2015, the average protein analysis values of the Trial were
21.90% for the Hasanbey variety as the highest and 10.26% for the Hisar variety as the lowest values.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Anonymous, (2021). FAO. https:// www. fao. org/ faostat/
- Amir Y, Haenni A L and Youyou A, (2006). Differences in the biochemical composition of dry legumes cultivated in North Algeria. EJEAFChe, 5(3); 1411-1418.
- Amini A, Ghannadha M and Abd-Mishani C, (2002). Genetic diversity and correlation between different traits in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian J. of Agricultural Sci., 33(4), 605-615.
- Anlarsal AE, Yücel C, Özveren D, (1999). A study to identify the parameters of yield and yield components for Chickpea in Eastern Mediterranean region. Turkish Field Crop Congress Third edition (Forage Crops and Edible Grain Legumes), pp:342- 347,15-18 November, Adana.
- Atmaca E, (2008). A study to identify the effect of different sowing date and density on the chickpea yield and quality paramaters under Eskişehir conditions, PhD Thesis, 90 s., Ankara
- Babagil GE, (2011). Investigating the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties for yield and yield paramaters in ecological conditions of Erzurum. Anatolia Agricultural Journal, 26(2):122- 127.
- Bakoğlu A, (2009). A study to investigate the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties for yield and yield paramaters in ecological conditions of Elazığ. Harran University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty. 13(1):1-6.
- Bayraktar H, Dolar FS and Tör M, (2007). Determination of genetic diversity within Ascochyta rabiei (Pass.) Labr., the cause of Ascochyta blight of chickpea in Turkey. Journal of Plant Pathology 89(3):341-347.
- Cin ST, Topal N, (2021); Determination of some quality characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes and relationships between characteristics, Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 9(1): 130-136.
- Erdemci İ, Yaşar M, Koç M, (2016). Evaluation of selection criteria i̇n winter chickpea using correlation coefficient and path analysis. YYU Tar. Bil. Derg. (YYU J Agr. Sci.), 26(1):1-6 Gül MK, Egesel CÖ, Kahrıman F, Tayyar Ş, (2006). Potentiality to grow winter chickpea in Çanakkale region. Uludag University, Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 20(1):57-66
- Kahraman A, Ceyhan E, Harmankaya M, (2015). Nutritional variation and drought tolerance in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Elem., 20(2): 331-341.DOI: 10.5601/jelem.2014.19.2.67
- Kaiser W J and Kusmenoglu I, (1997). Distribution of mating types and the teleomorph of Ascochyta rabiei on chickpea in Turkey. Plant Disease 81:1284-1287.
- Kalefetoğlu Macar T and Ekmekçi Y, (2009). Alterations in photochemical and physiological activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under drought stress, Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 195(5):335-346.
- Mart D, (2006). Investigation of relations among ascochyta blight and plant morphology with multi-regression on winter planted chickpea (Cicer arietinum) varieties in the Çukurova region, Ascochyta, 2-6 July 2006, Le Tronchet, France.
- Mart D, Çinkaya N, Karaköy T and Keçeli A, (2010), Adaptation of registered chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to Çukurova region and investigation of quality values in regional conditions, Book Abstracts, 5th International food legumes research conference (IFLRCV) and 7th European Conference on Grain Legumes (AEP VII); Legumes For Global Health Legume Crops And Products For Food, Feed And Environmental Benefits, April 26-30, 2010-Antalya.
- Mart D, Yücel D, Türkeri M, (2015). Evaluation of yield and morphological characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes at winter sowing time in Çukurova region, Turkey XI. Field Plants Congress, Canakkale, 19-23 September, 2015.
- Özer S, Karaköy T, Toklu F, Baloch F, Kilian B, Özkan H, (2010). Nutritional and physicochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica, 175(2): 237-249.
- Poniedziaek M, Sekara A, Ciura J, Jedrszczyk E, (2006). The effect of sowing times and locality on yield and seed quality of two chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Katedra Warzywnictwa Z Ekonomika Ogrodnictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Al. 29-Listopada 54, 31-425 Kraków, Poland.
- Sozen O and Karadavut U, (2018). Correlation and path analysis for yield performance and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes cultivated in Central Anatolia. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 50(2), 625-63
- Srivastava AK, Dixit GP, Mohammad Nisar N and Singh P, (2020). Genetic variability and interrelationships among grain physical and hydration traits in chickpea. Legume Research-An International Journal, DOI: 10.18805/LR-4407
- Slim SN, Saxena MC, (1993). Adaptation of springsown chickpea to the Mediterranean basin. II. factors influencing yield under drought, Field Crops Research, 34:137-146.
- Şehirali S, (1988). Food Legumes, Ankara Üni. Faculty of Agricultural Publications, 1089, Ankara, 435 s.
- Toğay N, Toğay Y and Çiftçi V, (2001). A study to identify the hydration capacity and the ratio of hard seed coat for Turkish chickpea varieties. Turkey Congress of Field Crops-IV Edition, 17-21 September 2001, 377-379. Tekirdağ.
- Ton A and Anlarsal AE, (2016). Determining correlation analysis and agro-morphological traits of some chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in Mediterranean climate conditions. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Uludağ Üniversitesi, 30:383-391.
Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Ziraat Mühendisliği |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Temmuz 2021 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2021 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 |
