Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici bir Araştırma

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 1454 - 1474, 30.11.2023

Ahmed Yusuf Sarıhan Beyhan Marşap

https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1327882

Öz

Bu çalışmada ihracat yapan işletmelerin lojistik yetenekleri ve tedarik zinciri performansları temel değişkenler olarak alınmış ve bunlara ek olarak alıcı-satıcı ilişkileri, şebeke ilişkileri ve teknolojik ilerleme değişkenleri ile araştırma deseni oluşturulmuştur. Araştırma tüm bu değişkenlerin işletme süreçleri içerisindeki önemi ile değişkenler arası ilişkilerin doğasını keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren yedi ihracatçı işletmenin tedarik zinciri süreçlerini tamamıyla yorumlayabilecek üst düzey yöneticileri ile görüşmeler yapılmıştır. İhracat yapan işletmelerin tedarik zinciri işleyişlerinin yerel düzeyde çalışan şirketlere göre farklılık gösterdiği göz önüne alındığında çalışma Türkiye’de bu anlamda yapılan nitel bir araştırma olma özelliği ile özgün değer taşımaktadır. Çalışma sonucunda ihracatçı işletmelerin tedarik zinciri performansı üzerinde en fazla rolü olan değişkenlerin lojistik yetenekler ve alıcı-satıcı ilişkilerinin kalitesi olduğu tespit edilirken en az rolü olan değişken şebeke ilişkileri olarak gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası ticaret ithalat-ihracat yönetimi tedarik zinciri performansı nitel araştırma

Kaynakça

  • Angerhofer, B.J. ve Angelides, M.C. (2006). A Model And A Performance Measurement System For Collaborative Supply Chains. Decision Support Systems.42, 283- 301.
  • Atkin, T. S., ve Rinehart, L. M. (2006). The Effect Of Negotiation Practices On The Relationship Between Suppliers And Customers. Negotiation Journal, 22(1), 47-65.
  • Autry, C. W., ve Golicic, S. L. (2010). Evaluating Buyer–Supplier Relationship–Performance Spirals: A Longitudinal Study. Journal Of Operations Management, 28(2), 87-100.
  • Banomyong, R., ve Supatn, N. (2011). Developing A Supply Chain Performance Tool For Smes İn Thailand. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 20-31.
  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, And Business Strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources And Sustained Competitive Advantage. Economics Meets Sociology İn Strategic Management (Pp. 203-227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Barney, J., Wright, M., ve Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The Resource-Based View Of The Firm: Ten Years After 1991. Journal Of Management, 27(6), 625-641.
  • Barua, A., ve Lee, B. (1997). The İnformation Technology Productivity Paradox Revisited: A Theoretical And Empirical İnvestigation İn The Manufacturing Sector. International Journal Of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 9(2), 145-166.
  • Bogdan, R. C., ve Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative Research For Education: An İntroduction To Theory And Methods (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Chandran, V. G. R., ve Rasiah, R. (2013). Firm Size, Technological Capability, Exports And Economic Performance: The Case Of Electronics İndustry İn Malaysia. Journal Of Business Economics And Management, 14(4), 741-757.
  • Chetty, S.K. ve Wilson, H.I.M. (2003), Collaborating With Competitors To Acquire Resources, International Business Review, Vol. 12 No. 1, Pp. 61-81.
  • Christopher, M. (1994). Logistics And Supply Chain Management. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin Professional.
  • Clinton, S. R., ve Closs, D. J. (1997). Logistics Strategy: Does İt Exist?. Journal Of Business Logistics, 18(1), 19.
  • Connolly, P. (1998). Dancing To The Wrong Tune’: Ethnography Generalization And Research On Racism İn Schools. Researching Racism İn Education: Politics, Theory, And Practice, 122-139.
  • Coombs, J. E., ve Bierly, P. E. (2006). Measuring Technological Capability And Performance”. R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
  • Corbin, J., ve Strauss, A. (2007). Basics Of Qualitative Research: Techniques And Procedures For Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cropley, A. J. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods: An İntroduction For Students Of Psychology And Education. Zinatne.
  • Daugherty, P. J., ve Pittman, P. H. (1995). Utilization Of Time-Based Strategies: Creating Distribution Flexibility/Responsiveness. International Journal Of Operations & Production Management, 15(2), 54-60.
  • Day, G. S. (2000). Managing Market Relationships. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 28(1), 24-30.
  • Day, G. S. 1994. The Capabilities Of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal Of Marketing 58 (4): 36–53. Dos Santos, B.L. ve Smith, L.S. (2008), RFID İn The Supply Chain: Panacea Or Pandora’s Box, Communications Of The ACM, Vol. 51 No. 10, Pp. 127-31
  • Drew, D., ve Hewitt, H. (2006). A Qualitative Approach To Understanding Patients' Diagnosis Of Lyme Disease. Public Health Nursing, 23(1), 20-26.
  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., ve Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal Of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
  • Fawcett, S. E., L. L. Stanley, ve S. R. Smith. 1997. Developing A Logistics Capability To Improve The Performance Of International Operations. Journal Of Business Logistics 18 (2): 101–27
  • Foggin, J., Mentzer, J. ve Monroe, C. (2004), A Supply Chain Diagnostic Tool, International Journal Of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 34 No. 10, Pp. 827-55.
  • Gallagher, S., ve Zahavi, D. (2008). The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction To Philosophy Of Mind And Cognitive Science. London: Routhledge
  • Ganeshan, R., Boone, T., ve Stenger, A. J. (2001). The İmpact Of İnventory And Flow Planning Parameters On Supply Chain Performance: An Exploratory Study. International Journal Of Production Economics, 71(1-3), 111-118.
  • Glaser, B., ve Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery Of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Gligor, D. M., ve Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Understanding The Role Of Logistics Capabilities İn Achieving Supply Chain Agility: A Systematic Literature Review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17(4), 438-453
  • Gligor, D., ve Holcomb, M. (2014a). The Road To Supply Chain Agility: An RBV Perspective On The Role Of Logistics Capabilities. The International Journal Of Logistics Management, 25(1), 160-179.
  • Gligor, D. M., ve Holcomb, M. C. (2014b). Antecedents And Consequences Of İntegrating Logistics Capabilities Across The Supply Chain. Transportation Journal, 53(2), 211-234.
  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., ve Mcgaughey, R. E. (2004). A Framework For Supply Chain Performance Measurement. International Journal Of Production Economics, 87(3), 333-347.
  • Hagedoorn, J. (2006) Understanding The Cross-Level Embeddedness Of İnter-Firm Partnership Formation. Academy Of Management Review 31, 670–680.
  • Håkansson, H., ve Snehota, I. (1989). No Business İs An İsland: The Network Concept Of Business Strategy. Scandinavian Journal Of Management, 5(3), 187-200.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., ve Lee, H. U. (2000). Technological Learning, Knowledge Management, Firm Growth And Performance: An İntroductory Essay. Journal Of Engineering And Technology Management, 17(3-4), 231-246.
  • Jap, S. D. (2001). Perspectives On Joint Competitive Advantages İn Buyer–Supplier Relationships. International Journal Of Research İn Marketing, 18(1-2), 19-35.
  • Jin, J., ve Von Zedtwitz, M. (2008). Technological Capability Development İn China's Mobile Phone İndustry. Technovation, 28(6), 327-334.
  • Johanson, J. ve Mattsson, L. (1988), Internationalization İn İndustrial Systems: A Network Approach, İn Buckley, P.J. And Ghauri, P.N. (Eds), The Internationalization Of The Firm: A Reader, Academic Press, London, Pp. 303-21
  • Johanson, J. ve Vahlne, J.-E. (2006), Commitment And Opportunity Development İn The İnternationalization Process: A Note On The Uppsala İnternationalization Process Model, Management International Review, Vol. 46 No. 2, Pp. 165-78.
  • Kumar, K., ve Van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict And Cooperation İn İnterorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279–300
  • Lahiri, S., ve Kedia, B. L. (2011). Determining Quality Of Business-To-Business Relationships: A Study Of Indian IT-Enabled Service Providers. European Management Journal, 29(1), 11-24.
  • Lall, S., 1990. Building Industrial Competitiveness İn Developing Countries. OECD, Paris.
  • Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A., ve Gardner, J. T. (1996). Developing And İmplementing Supply Chain Partnerships. The İnternational Journal Of Logistics Management, 7(2), 1-18.
  • Lassar, W. M., ve Zinn, W. (1995). Informal Channel Relationships İn Logistics. Journal Of Business Logistics, 16(1), 81.
  • Lee, C. W., Kwon, I. W. G., ve Severance, D. (2007). Relationship Between Supply Chain Performance And Degree Of Linkage Among Supplier, İnternal İntegration, And Customer. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12(6), 444-452
  • Leedy, P.D., ve Ormrod, J.E. (2005) Practical Research Planning And Design, Pearson Education International, 8th Edition.
  • Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T.S. ve Rao, S.S. (2006), The İmpact Of Supply Chain Management Practices On Competitive Advantage And Organizational Performance, OMEGA, Vol. 34 No. 2, Pp. 107-24.
  • Li, W., Guo, B., ve Xu, G. (2017). How Do Linking, Leveraging And Learning Capabilities İnfluence The Entry Mode Choice For Multinational Firms From Emerging Markets?. Baltic Journal Of Management, 12(2), 171-193.
  • Lin, F. R., Huang, S. H., ve Lin, S. C. (2002). Effects Of İnformation Sharing On Supply Chain Performance İn Electronic Commerce. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 49(3), 258-268.
  • Lin, Y., Wang, Y., ve Yu, C. (2010). Investigating The Drivers Of The İnnovation İn Channel İntegration And Supply Chain Performance: A Strategy Orientated Perspective. International Journal Of Production Economics, 127(2), 320-332.
  • Liu, X., ve Ma, S. (2005, October). Quantitative Analysis Of Enterprise's Logistics Capability Based On Supply Chain Performance. In IEEE International Conference On E-Business Engineering (ICEBE'05) (Pp. 191-194). IEEE.
  • Mandal, S., Bhattacharya, S., Korasiga, V. R., ve Sarathy, R. (2017). The Dominant İnfluence Of Logistics Capabilities On İntegration: Empirical Evidence From Supply Chain Resilience. International Journal Of Disaster Resilience İn The Built Environment, 8(4), 357-374.
  • Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon Multinationals: New Players İn 21 St Century Globalization. Asia Pacific Journal Of Management, 23(1), 5-27.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An İnteractive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A Realist Approach For Qualitative Research. Sage.
  • Mentzer, J. T., S. Min, ve L. M. Bobbitt. 2004. Toward A Unified Theory Of Logistics. International Journal Of Physical Distribution And Logistics Management 34 (8): 606–27.
  • Mohannak, K. (2007), Innovation Networks And Capability Building İn The Australian High-Technology Smes, European Journal Of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 2, Pp. 236-51.
  • Morash, E. A., C. L. M. Dröge, ve S. K. Vickery. 1996. Strategic Logistics Capabilities For Competitive Advantage And Firm Success. Journal Of Business Logistics 17 (1): 1–22.
  • Musteen, M., Francis, J., ve Datta, D. K. (2010). The İnfluence Of İnternational Networks On İnternationalization Speed And Performance: A Study Ofczech Smes. Journal Of world Business, 45(3), 197–205
  • Olsen, N. V., Elvekrok, I., ve Nilsen, E. R. (2012). Drivers Of Food Smes Network Success: 101 Tales From Norway. Trends İn Food Science & Technology, 26(2), 120–128
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., ve Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking The “Q” Out Of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without The Divide Between Quantitative And Qualitative Paradigms. Quality & Quantity: International Journal Of Methodology, 39, 267-296.
  • Perona, M., ve Miragliotta, G. (2004). Complexity Management And Supply Chain Performance Assessment. A Field Study And A Conceptual Framework. International Journal Of Production Economics, 90(1), 103-115.
  • Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York.
  • Prahalad, C.K. ve Hamel, G., (1990). The Core Competence Of The Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 6(7).
  • Ramdas, K., ve Spekman, R. E. (2000). Chain Or Shackles: Understanding What Drives Supply-Chain Performance. Interfaces, 30(4), 3-21.
  • Ramsay, J. (2004). Serendipity And The Realpolitik Of Negotiations İn Supply Chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(3), 219-229.
  • Sauvage, T. (2003). The Relationship Between Technology And Logistics Third-Party Providers. International Journal Of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(3), 236-253.
  • Schoenecker, T., ve Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators Of Firm Technological Capability: Validity And Performance İmplications. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 49(1), 36-44.
  • Seidman, I. E. (1998). Interviewing As Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Silverman, D. (1998). Qualitative Research: Meanings Or Practices?. Information Systems Journal, 8(1), 3-20.
  • Stank, T. P., ve Lackey Jr, C. W. (1997). Enhancing Performance Through Logistical Capabilities İn Mexican Maquiladora Firms. Journal Of Business Logistics, 18(1), 91.
  • Tan, K.C., Kannan, V.R. ve Handfield, R.B. (1998), Supply Chain Management Supplier Performance And Firm Performance, International Journal Of Purchasing And Materials Management, Vol. 34 No. 3, Pp. 2-9.
  • Teirlinck, P., ve Spithoven, A. (2013). Formal R&D Management And Strategic Decision Making İn Small Firms İn Knowledge-İntensive Business Services. R&D Management, 43(1), 37–51
  • Thonemann, U. W. (2002). Improving Supply-Chain Performance By Sharing Advance Demand İnformation. European Journal Of Operational Research, 142(1), 81-107.
  • Thonemann, U. W., ve Bradley, J. R. (2002). The Effect Of Product Variety On Supply-Chain Performance. European Journal Of Operational Research, 143(3), 548-569.
  • Tsai, K. H. (2004). “The İmpact Of Technological Capability On Firm Performance İn Taiwan's Electronics İndustry.” The Journal Of High Technology Management Research, 15(2), 183-195.
  • Van Den Berg, L., Braun, E., ve Van Winden, W. (2001). Growth Clusters İn European Metropolitan Cities, A Comparative Analysis Of Cluster Dynamics İn The Cities Of Amsterdam, Eindhoven, Helsinki, Leipzig, Lyons, Manchester, Munich, Rotterdam And Vienna. The Netherlands/England: European Institute For Comparative Urban Research, Erasmus University Rotterdam/Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  • Vickery, S.K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C.,ve Calantone, R., 2003. The Effects Of An İntegrative Supply Chain Strategy On Customer Service And Financial Performance: An Analysis Of Direct Versus İndirect Relationships. Journal Of Operations Management 21 (5), 523–539.
  • Wang, M., Jie, F., ve Abareshi, A. (2015). Evaluating Logistics Capability For Mitigation Of Supply Chain Uncertainty And Risk İn The Australian Courier Firms. Asia Pacific Journal Of Marketing And Logistics, 27(3), 486-498.
  • Wu, L., Chuang, C. H., ve Hsu, C. H. (2014). Information Sharing And Collaborative Behaviors İn Enabling Supply Chain Performance: A Social Exchange Perspective. International Journal Of Production Economics, 148, 122-132.
  • Xu, L., ve Beamon, B. M. (2006). Supply Chain Coordination And Cooperation Mechanisms: An Attribute‐Based Approach. Journal Of Supply Chain Management, 42(1), 4-12.
  • Xu, L., ve S. Wang. 2012. Empirical Research On Construct Of Chain Store Logistics Capability System. I-Business 4 (1): 10–17
  • Zahra, S. A., Matherne, B. P., ve Carleton, J. M. (2003). Technological Resource Leveraging And The İnternationalisation Of New Ventures. Journal Of International Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 163-186.

An Exploratory Research on the Relationship between Logistics Capabilities and Supply Chain Performance in Exporting Enterprises

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 1454 - 1474, 30.11.2023

Ahmed Yusuf Sarıhan Beyhan Marşap

https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1327882

Öz

In this study, the logistics capabilities and supply chain performance of exporting companies were taken as two main variables. Additionally, variables such as buyer-seller relationships, network relationships, and technological advancements were included to form the research design. The aim of the research is to explore the importance of these variables within the operational processes of the companies and the nature of the relationships between the variables. Interviews were conducted with top-level managers who have a comprehensive understanding of the supply chain processes of seven exporting companies operating in Turkey. Considering that the functioning of supply chains in exporting companies differs from locally operating firms, this study carries unique value as a qualitative research conducted in Turkey. The study findings indicate that logistics capabilities and the quality of buyer-seller relationships are the variables that play the most significant role in the supply chain performance of exporting companies, while network relationships are observed to have the least impact.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International trade import-export management supply chain performance qualitative research

Kaynakça

  • Angerhofer, B.J. ve Angelides, M.C. (2006). A Model And A Performance Measurement System For Collaborative Supply Chains. Decision Support Systems.42, 283- 301.
  • Atkin, T. S., ve Rinehart, L. M. (2006). The Effect Of Negotiation Practices On The Relationship Between Suppliers And Customers. Negotiation Journal, 22(1), 47-65.
  • Autry, C. W., ve Golicic, S. L. (2010). Evaluating Buyer–Supplier Relationship–Performance Spirals: A Longitudinal Study. Journal Of Operations Management, 28(2), 87-100.
  • Banomyong, R., ve Supatn, N. (2011). Developing A Supply Chain Performance Tool For Smes İn Thailand. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 20-31.
  • Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, And Business Strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231-1241.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources And Sustained Competitive Advantage. Economics Meets Sociology İn Strategic Management (Pp. 203-227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Barney, J., Wright, M., ve Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2001). The Resource-Based View Of The Firm: Ten Years After 1991. Journal Of Management, 27(6), 625-641.
  • Barua, A., ve Lee, B. (1997). The İnformation Technology Productivity Paradox Revisited: A Theoretical And Empirical İnvestigation İn The Manufacturing Sector. International Journal Of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 9(2), 145-166.
  • Bogdan, R. C., ve Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative Research For Education: An İntroduction To Theory And Methods (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Chandran, V. G. R., ve Rasiah, R. (2013). Firm Size, Technological Capability, Exports And Economic Performance: The Case Of Electronics İndustry İn Malaysia. Journal Of Business Economics And Management, 14(4), 741-757.
  • Chetty, S.K. ve Wilson, H.I.M. (2003), Collaborating With Competitors To Acquire Resources, International Business Review, Vol. 12 No. 1, Pp. 61-81.
  • Christopher, M. (1994). Logistics And Supply Chain Management. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin Professional.
  • Clinton, S. R., ve Closs, D. J. (1997). Logistics Strategy: Does İt Exist?. Journal Of Business Logistics, 18(1), 19.
  • Connolly, P. (1998). Dancing To The Wrong Tune’: Ethnography Generalization And Research On Racism İn Schools. Researching Racism İn Education: Politics, Theory, And Practice, 122-139.
  • Coombs, J. E., ve Bierly, P. E. (2006). Measuring Technological Capability And Performance”. R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
  • Corbin, J., ve Strauss, A. (2007). Basics Of Qualitative Research: Techniques And Procedures For Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cropley, A. J. (2002). Qualitative Research Methods: An İntroduction For Students Of Psychology And Education. Zinatne.
  • Daugherty, P. J., ve Pittman, P. H. (1995). Utilization Of Time-Based Strategies: Creating Distribution Flexibility/Responsiveness. International Journal Of Operations & Production Management, 15(2), 54-60.
  • Day, G. S. (2000). Managing Market Relationships. Journal Of The Academy Of Marketing Science, 28(1), 24-30.
  • Day, G. S. 1994. The Capabilities Of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal Of Marketing 58 (4): 36–53. Dos Santos, B.L. ve Smith, L.S. (2008), RFID İn The Supply Chain: Panacea Or Pandora’s Box, Communications Of The ACM, Vol. 51 No. 10, Pp. 127-31
  • Drew, D., ve Hewitt, H. (2006). A Qualitative Approach To Understanding Patients' Diagnosis Of Lyme Disease. Public Health Nursing, 23(1), 20-26.
  • Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., ve Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal Of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.
  • Fawcett, S. E., L. L. Stanley, ve S. R. Smith. 1997. Developing A Logistics Capability To Improve The Performance Of International Operations. Journal Of Business Logistics 18 (2): 101–27
  • Foggin, J., Mentzer, J. ve Monroe, C. (2004), A Supply Chain Diagnostic Tool, International Journal Of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 34 No. 10, Pp. 827-55.
  • Gallagher, S., ve Zahavi, D. (2008). The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction To Philosophy Of Mind And Cognitive Science. London: Routhledge
  • Ganeshan, R., Boone, T., ve Stenger, A. J. (2001). The İmpact Of İnventory And Flow Planning Parameters On Supply Chain Performance: An Exploratory Study. International Journal Of Production Economics, 71(1-3), 111-118.
  • Glaser, B., ve Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery Of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
  • Gligor, D. M., ve Holcomb, M. C. (2012). Understanding The Role Of Logistics Capabilities İn Achieving Supply Chain Agility: A Systematic Literature Review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 17(4), 438-453
  • Gligor, D., ve Holcomb, M. (2014a). The Road To Supply Chain Agility: An RBV Perspective On The Role Of Logistics Capabilities. The International Journal Of Logistics Management, 25(1), 160-179.
  • Gligor, D. M., ve Holcomb, M. C. (2014b). Antecedents And Consequences Of İntegrating Logistics Capabilities Across The Supply Chain. Transportation Journal, 53(2), 211-234.
  • Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., ve Mcgaughey, R. E. (2004). A Framework For Supply Chain Performance Measurement. International Journal Of Production Economics, 87(3), 333-347.
  • Hagedoorn, J. (2006) Understanding The Cross-Level Embeddedness Of İnter-Firm Partnership Formation. Academy Of Management Review 31, 670–680.
  • Håkansson, H., ve Snehota, I. (1989). No Business İs An İsland: The Network Concept Of Business Strategy. Scandinavian Journal Of Management, 5(3), 187-200.
  • Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., ve Lee, H. U. (2000). Technological Learning, Knowledge Management, Firm Growth And Performance: An İntroductory Essay. Journal Of Engineering And Technology Management, 17(3-4), 231-246.
  • Jap, S. D. (2001). Perspectives On Joint Competitive Advantages İn Buyer–Supplier Relationships. International Journal Of Research İn Marketing, 18(1-2), 19-35.
  • Jin, J., ve Von Zedtwitz, M. (2008). Technological Capability Development İn China's Mobile Phone İndustry. Technovation, 28(6), 327-334.
  • Johanson, J. ve Mattsson, L. (1988), Internationalization İn İndustrial Systems: A Network Approach, İn Buckley, P.J. And Ghauri, P.N. (Eds), The Internationalization Of The Firm: A Reader, Academic Press, London, Pp. 303-21
  • Johanson, J. ve Vahlne, J.-E. (2006), Commitment And Opportunity Development İn The İnternationalization Process: A Note On The Uppsala İnternationalization Process Model, Management International Review, Vol. 46 No. 2, Pp. 165-78.
  • Kumar, K., ve Van Dissel, H. G. (1996). Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict And Cooperation İn İnterorganizational Systems. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 279–300
  • Lahiri, S., ve Kedia, B. L. (2011). Determining Quality Of Business-To-Business Relationships: A Study Of Indian IT-Enabled Service Providers. European Management Journal, 29(1), 11-24.
  • Lall, S., 1990. Building Industrial Competitiveness İn Developing Countries. OECD, Paris.
  • Lambert, D. M., Emmelhainz, M. A., ve Gardner, J. T. (1996). Developing And İmplementing Supply Chain Partnerships. The İnternational Journal Of Logistics Management, 7(2), 1-18.
  • Lassar, W. M., ve Zinn, W. (1995). Informal Channel Relationships İn Logistics. Journal Of Business Logistics, 16(1), 81.
  • Lee, C. W., Kwon, I. W. G., ve Severance, D. (2007). Relationship Between Supply Chain Performance And Degree Of Linkage Among Supplier, İnternal İntegration, And Customer. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12(6), 444-452
  • Leedy, P.D., ve Ormrod, J.E. (2005) Practical Research Planning And Design, Pearson Education International, 8th Edition.
  • Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T.S. ve Rao, S.S. (2006), The İmpact Of Supply Chain Management Practices On Competitive Advantage And Organizational Performance, OMEGA, Vol. 34 No. 2, Pp. 107-24.
  • Li, W., Guo, B., ve Xu, G. (2017). How Do Linking, Leveraging And Learning Capabilities İnfluence The Entry Mode Choice For Multinational Firms From Emerging Markets?. Baltic Journal Of Management, 12(2), 171-193.
  • Lin, F. R., Huang, S. H., ve Lin, S. C. (2002). Effects Of İnformation Sharing On Supply Chain Performance İn Electronic Commerce. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 49(3), 258-268.
  • Lin, Y., Wang, Y., ve Yu, C. (2010). Investigating The Drivers Of The İnnovation İn Channel İntegration And Supply Chain Performance: A Strategy Orientated Perspective. International Journal Of Production Economics, 127(2), 320-332.
  • Liu, X., ve Ma, S. (2005, October). Quantitative Analysis Of Enterprise's Logistics Capability Based On Supply Chain Performance. In IEEE International Conference On E-Business Engineering (ICEBE'05) (Pp. 191-194). IEEE.
  • Mandal, S., Bhattacharya, S., Korasiga, V. R., ve Sarathy, R. (2017). The Dominant İnfluence Of Logistics Capabilities On İntegration: Empirical Evidence From Supply Chain Resilience. International Journal Of Disaster Resilience İn The Built Environment, 8(4), 357-374.
  • Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon Multinationals: New Players İn 21 St Century Globalization. Asia Pacific Journal Of Management, 23(1), 5-27.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An İnteractive Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2012). A Realist Approach For Qualitative Research. Sage.
  • Mentzer, J. T., S. Min, ve L. M. Bobbitt. 2004. Toward A Unified Theory Of Logistics. International Journal Of Physical Distribution And Logistics Management 34 (8): 606–27.
  • Mohannak, K. (2007), Innovation Networks And Capability Building İn The Australian High-Technology Smes, European Journal Of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 2, Pp. 236-51.
  • Morash, E. A., C. L. M. Dröge, ve S. K. Vickery. 1996. Strategic Logistics Capabilities For Competitive Advantage And Firm Success. Journal Of Business Logistics 17 (1): 1–22.
  • Musteen, M., Francis, J., ve Datta, D. K. (2010). The İnfluence Of İnternational Networks On İnternationalization Speed And Performance: A Study Ofczech Smes. Journal Of world Business, 45(3), 197–205
  • Olsen, N. V., Elvekrok, I., ve Nilsen, E. R. (2012). Drivers Of Food Smes Network Success: 101 Tales From Norway. Trends İn Food Science & Technology, 26(2), 120–128
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., ve Leech, N. L. (2005). Taking The “Q” Out Of Research: Teaching Research Methodology Courses Without The Divide Between Quantitative And Qualitative Paradigms. Quality & Quantity: International Journal Of Methodology, 39, 267-296.
  • Perona, M., ve Miragliotta, G. (2004). Complexity Management And Supply Chain Performance Assessment. A Field Study And A Conceptual Framework. International Journal Of Production Economics, 90(1), 103-115.
  • Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York.
  • Prahalad, C.K. ve Hamel, G., (1990). The Core Competence Of The Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 6(7).
  • Ramdas, K., ve Spekman, R. E. (2000). Chain Or Shackles: Understanding What Drives Supply-Chain Performance. Interfaces, 30(4), 3-21.
  • Ramsay, J. (2004). Serendipity And The Realpolitik Of Negotiations İn Supply Chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(3), 219-229.
  • Sauvage, T. (2003). The Relationship Between Technology And Logistics Third-Party Providers. International Journal Of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(3), 236-253.
  • Schoenecker, T., ve Swanson, L. (2002). Indicators Of Firm Technological Capability: Validity And Performance İmplications. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 49(1), 36-44.
  • Seidman, I. E. (1998). Interviewing As Qualitative Research (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Silverman, D. (1998). Qualitative Research: Meanings Or Practices?. Information Systems Journal, 8(1), 3-20.
  • Stank, T. P., ve Lackey Jr, C. W. (1997). Enhancing Performance Through Logistical Capabilities İn Mexican Maquiladora Firms. Journal Of Business Logistics, 18(1), 91.
  • Tan, K.C., Kannan, V.R. ve Handfield, R.B. (1998), Supply Chain Management Supplier Performance And Firm Performance, International Journal Of Purchasing And Materials Management, Vol. 34 No. 3, Pp. 2-9.
  • Teirlinck, P., ve Spithoven, A. (2013). Formal R&D Management And Strategic Decision Making İn Small Firms İn Knowledge-İntensive Business Services. R&D Management, 43(1), 37–51
  • Thonemann, U. W. (2002). Improving Supply-Chain Performance By Sharing Advance Demand İnformation. European Journal Of Operational Research, 142(1), 81-107.
  • Thonemann, U. W., ve Bradley, J. R. (2002). The Effect Of Product Variety On Supply-Chain Performance. European Journal Of Operational Research, 143(3), 548-569.
  • Tsai, K. H. (2004). “The İmpact Of Technological Capability On Firm Performance İn Taiwan's Electronics İndustry.” The Journal Of High Technology Management Research, 15(2), 183-195.
  • Van Den Berg, L., Braun, E., ve Van Winden, W. (2001). Growth Clusters İn European Metropolitan Cities, A Comparative Analysis Of Cluster Dynamics İn The Cities Of Amsterdam, Eindhoven, Helsinki, Leipzig, Lyons, Manchester, Munich, Rotterdam And Vienna. The Netherlands/England: European Institute For Comparative Urban Research, Erasmus University Rotterdam/Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
  • Vickery, S.K., Jayaram, J., Droge, C.,ve Calantone, R., 2003. The Effects Of An İntegrative Supply Chain Strategy On Customer Service And Financial Performance: An Analysis Of Direct Versus İndirect Relationships. Journal Of Operations Management 21 (5), 523–539.
  • Wang, M., Jie, F., ve Abareshi, A. (2015). Evaluating Logistics Capability For Mitigation Of Supply Chain Uncertainty And Risk İn The Australian Courier Firms. Asia Pacific Journal Of Marketing And Logistics, 27(3), 486-498.
  • Wu, L., Chuang, C. H., ve Hsu, C. H. (2014). Information Sharing And Collaborative Behaviors İn Enabling Supply Chain Performance: A Social Exchange Perspective. International Journal Of Production Economics, 148, 122-132.
  • Xu, L., ve Beamon, B. M. (2006). Supply Chain Coordination And Cooperation Mechanisms: An Attribute‐Based Approach. Journal Of Supply Chain Management, 42(1), 4-12.
  • Xu, L., ve S. Wang. 2012. Empirical Research On Construct Of Chain Store Logistics Capability System. I-Business 4 (1): 10–17
  • Zahra, S. A., Matherne, B. P., ve Carleton, J. M. (2003). Technological Resource Leveraging And The İnternationalisation Of New Ventures. Journal Of International Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 163-186.
Toplam 82 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular İthalat İhracat Yönetimi, Uluslararası Lojistik
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Ahmed Yusuf Sarıhan 0000-0001-7119-9852

Beyhan Marşap 0000-0003-2139-7169

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 30 Kasım 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Kasım 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Sarıhan, A. Y., & Marşap, B. (2023). İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici bir Araştırma. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 1454-1474. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1327882
AMA Sarıhan AY, Marşap B. İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici bir Araştırma. ASBİ. Kasım 2023;23(3):1454-1474. doi:10.11616/asbi.1327882
Chicago Sarıhan, Ahmed Yusuf, ve Beyhan Marşap. “İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı Ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici Bir Araştırma”. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23, sy. 3 (Kasım 2023): 1454-74. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1327882.
EndNote Sarıhan AY, Marşap B (01 Kasım 2023) İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici bir Araştırma. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23 3 1454–1474.
IEEE A. Y. Sarıhan ve B. Marşap, “İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici bir Araştırma”, ASBİ, c. 23, sy. 3, ss. 1454–1474, 2023, doi: 10.11616/asbi.1327882.
ISNAD Sarıhan, Ahmed Yusuf - Marşap, Beyhan. “İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı Ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici Bir Araştırma”. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 23/3 (Kasım 2023), 1454-1474. https://doi.org/10.11616/asbi.1327882.
JAMA Sarıhan AY, Marşap B. İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici bir Araştırma. ASBİ. 2023;23:1454–1474.
MLA Sarıhan, Ahmed Yusuf ve Beyhan Marşap. “İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı Ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici Bir Araştırma”. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 23, sy. 3, 2023, ss. 1454-7, doi:10.11616/asbi.1327882.
Vancouver Sarıhan AY, Marşap B. İhracatçı İşletmelerde Lojistik Yeteneklerin Tedarik Zinciri Performansı ile İlişkisi Üzerine Keşfedici bir Araştırma. ASBİ. 2023;23(3):1454-7.
 Kapak Resmi İndir