Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 6, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.53663/turjfas.1201035

Abstract

References

  • Akalp, H.G., Saklangıç, U. & Çırakoğlu, S. (2021). Zeytin Tarımında Çalışan İşçilerin Çalışma Duruşlarının REBA Yöntemi İle Analizi. Ergonomi, 4(2), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.961369
  • Aygün, İ., Çakmak, B. & Alayunt, F. N. (2018). Narenciye hasadının ergonomik açıdan incelenmesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6, 312-318. https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.358270
  • Baş, H., Sönmez, H. A., Öztürk, H. & Yapıcı, F. (2018). Çalışma duruşunun kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarına etkileri ve örnek uygulama. Ergonomi, 1(2), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.481341
  • Beyhan, M. A., & Sauk H. (2018). Türkiye’de Fındık Tarımında Mekanizasyon Durumu. TÜRKTOB Dergisi, Sayı: 27 Sayfa: 22-27.
  • Das, B., & Gangopadhyay, S. (2015). Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and physiological stress among adult, male potato cultivators of West Bengal, India. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 1669-1682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539511421808
  • İlkyaz, H. (1986). Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde çay ve fındığın üretim girdi ve maliyetleri. Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Genel Yayın, (38).
  • Kamble, R., Vinu Vimal, V.J. & Pandit, S. (2022). Ergonomic Study on Farmers Involved with Cotton Harvesting in Haryana. International Conference of The Indian Society of Ergonomics (pp. 889-896). Springer, Cham.
  • Kır, İ. (2015). Adana ve Mersin Bölgesinde Seracılık Sektöründe Çalışanların Karşılaştığı Ergonomik Risklerin Değerlendirilmesi. Ç. V. S. G. Bakanlığı, İçel İl Müdürlüğü. Adana.
  • Riemer, R., & Bechar, A. (2016). Investigation of productivity enhancement and biomechanical risks in greenhouse crops. Biosystems Engineering, 147, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.03.009
  • Schuman, S.H. (2002). Ergonomics in agriculture: Commentary and literature review. Journal of Agromedicine, 8(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J096v08n01_02
  • TUIK (2022). Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri, https://data.tuik.gov.tr (Erişim: Mayıs, 2022).
  • Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, D., Wu, Z., Bai, R., & Meng, G. (2019). Ergonomic and efficiency analysis of conventional apple harvest process. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 12(2), 210-217.

Evaluation of employee positions by different ergonomic risk analysis methods in manual harvesting of hazelnuts

Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 6, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.53663/turjfas.1201035

Abstract

In this study, working postures during the manual harvesting of hazelnuts were analyzed with four different ergonomic risk assessment methods, namely REBA, AWBA, OWAS, and RULA, and the differences between them were revealed. The most appropriate method for manual harvesting activities was determined. Hand harvesting of hazelnuts; It consists of three main workstations: shaking the branches by hand, collecting them manually from the branches, and containing them manually from the ground. There are three different ways of sitting in the hand-harvesting of hazelnuts: standing on knees, bending over, or cross-legged. During the manual harvest, the workers' movements at all workstations were observed and recorded with a camera. Images were analyzed using the ErgoFellow 2.0 program. As a result of the analysis, working postures that may cause musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) were determined. According to the analysis results, shaking the hazelnut by hand and harvesting from the branch by hand were risky compared to the other three analysis methods, except for the Ovako Working Posture Analyzing System (OWAS) method. In manual harvesting from the ground, high-risk scores were obtained in all working postures, Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA), Agricultural Whole-Body Assessment (AWBA), Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), and OWAS methods, and it was determined in the category of urgent action change. Among the ergonomic risk analysis methods, it can be said that AWBA is the analysis method that includes the closest positions of working postures in the manual harvest of hazelnuts.

References

  • Akalp, H.G., Saklangıç, U. & Çırakoğlu, S. (2021). Zeytin Tarımında Çalışan İşçilerin Çalışma Duruşlarının REBA Yöntemi İle Analizi. Ergonomi, 4(2), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.961369
  • Aygün, İ., Çakmak, B. & Alayunt, F. N. (2018). Narenciye hasadının ergonomik açıdan incelenmesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6, 312-318. https://doi.org/10.21923/jesd.358270
  • Baş, H., Sönmez, H. A., Öztürk, H. & Yapıcı, F. (2018). Çalışma duruşunun kas-iskelet sistemi rahatsızlıklarına etkileri ve örnek uygulama. Ergonomi, 1(2), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.481341
  • Beyhan, M. A., & Sauk H. (2018). Türkiye’de Fındık Tarımında Mekanizasyon Durumu. TÜRKTOB Dergisi, Sayı: 27 Sayfa: 22-27.
  • Das, B., & Gangopadhyay, S. (2015). Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and physiological stress among adult, male potato cultivators of West Bengal, India. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 1669-1682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539511421808
  • İlkyaz, H. (1986). Doğu Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde çay ve fındığın üretim girdi ve maliyetleri. Tarım Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Köy Hizmetleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Genel Yayın, (38).
  • Kamble, R., Vinu Vimal, V.J. & Pandit, S. (2022). Ergonomic Study on Farmers Involved with Cotton Harvesting in Haryana. International Conference of The Indian Society of Ergonomics (pp. 889-896). Springer, Cham.
  • Kır, İ. (2015). Adana ve Mersin Bölgesinde Seracılık Sektöründe Çalışanların Karşılaştığı Ergonomik Risklerin Değerlendirilmesi. Ç. V. S. G. Bakanlığı, İçel İl Müdürlüğü. Adana.
  • Riemer, R., & Bechar, A. (2016). Investigation of productivity enhancement and biomechanical risks in greenhouse crops. Biosystems Engineering, 147, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.03.009
  • Schuman, S.H. (2002). Ergonomics in agriculture: Commentary and literature review. Journal of Agromedicine, 8(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J096v08n01_02
  • TUIK (2022). Bitkisel Üretim İstatistikleri, https://data.tuik.gov.tr (Erişim: Mayıs, 2022).
  • Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, D., Wu, Z., Bai, R., & Meng, G. (2019). Ergonomic and efficiency analysis of conventional apple harvest process. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 12(2), 210-217.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Biosystem, Agronomy
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Hüseyin Sauk 0000-0001-5622-6170

Kübra Meriç Kalın Uğurlutepe 0000-0001-7184-3388

Early Pub Date June 19, 2023
Publication Date June 30, 2023
Submission Date November 8, 2022
Acceptance Date January 19, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Sauk, H., & Kalın Uğurlutepe, K. M. (2023). Evaluation of employee positions by different ergonomic risk analysis methods in manual harvesting of hazelnuts. Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences, 5(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.53663/turjfas.1201035

 22605      22604        23639     


17579     21244    21245   29292



21866   

Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences (TURJFAS) is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is accordance with the BOAI (Budapest Open Access Initiative) definition of open access. 


 17580 

Turkish Journal of Food and Agriculture Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Journal Abbreviation: Turk J Food Agric Sci