Abstract
Citizen Design Science is a new co-design strategy for urban and architectural systems that improves the planning, design, management, and renewal of cities, urban habitats, and architectural structures, using active design tools through citizens' observation, experience, and local knowledge. The aim of this study is to describe how Atakent Parking Area is transformed into a public space design and implementation through both digital and analog active design tools in the co-design process that includes citizens' spatial experiences, needs, and desires through the method of citizen design science. The objective indicators and subjective perception applied in the study were combined in the co-design process to implement an urban design project. The experimental collaborative urban design process is realized on a democratic platform based on the tendencies and expectations of the participants. Two conceptual urban design projects were prepared with design science data including citizens' wishes, needs, and suggestions about the area, and participating citizens were asked to vote for the project democratically in the urban space. The selected conceptual design project was transformed into an implementation project in the urban area.
Keywords
Citizen science citizen design science co-design participatory urban design hierarchical clustering analysis
Supporting Institution
İzmir Karşıyaka Belediyesi
Thanks
This project was carried out with the protocol signed with Karşıyaka Municipality. We would like to thank Karşıyaka Municipality, Urban Design Directorate-Urban Vision Development Office and Citizen Participation Office’s managers and employees, Industrial Designer Yavuz Cengiz, as well as all participants from Karşıyaka who contributed to the project. Also, this article is extracted from the doctorate dissertation entitled “Citizen Design Science in the Context of Crowd-Creative Design Practices: Case of Izmir”, supervised by Prof. Dr. Koray Velibeyoğlu (Ph.D. Dissertation, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Department of Urban Regeneration, Izmir/Turkey, 2023). The article complies with national and international research and publication ethics. Ethics Committee approval was not required for the study.
References
- Ardito, C., Buono, P., Costabile, M. F., Lanzilotti, R. & Piccinno, A. (2012). End users as co-designers of their own tools and products. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 23(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.11.005
- Dilaver, N., Küçükerman, Ö. & Hasırcı, D. (2022). User-centered approaches in conventional and autonomous truck design and future effects on environmental design. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(Special Issue), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1023350
- Erdem, N. (2022). Dirençli kent ve kompakt kent modelleri̇ni sürdürülebi̇li̇rli̇k çerçevesi̇nde değerlendi̇rmesi̇. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 10(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.1191672
- Gül, A., Keleş, E. & Zun, Ö. F. U. (2016). Recreational demand and trends in the campus students and lecturers of Süleyman Demirel University. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Architecture Sciences and Applications, 1(1), 26–43.
- Irwın, A. (1995). Citizen Science. Opticon1826, 10, 1–6.
- Klinsch, E. (2014). Research Collection. BRISK Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints, 2(6), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010025751
- Lu, H. & Schmitt, G. (2017). Human Computation and Crowdsourcing for Knowledge Elicitation in Citizen Design Science.
- Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Harvard-MIT Joint Center for Urban Studies Series.
- Mueller, J. & Lu, H. (2017). Designing with citizens : Challenges and evaluation methods for crowd-sourced urban layouts. CAID@ IJCAI, 34–39.
- Mueller, Johannes, Asada, S. & Tomarchio, L. (2020). Engaging the crowd: Lessons for outreach and tool design from a creative online participatory study. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020040101.oa
- Mueller, Johannes, Lu, H., Chirkin, A., Klein, B. & Schmitt, G. (2018a). Citizen design science: A strategy for crowd- creative urban design. Cities, 72(August 2017), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018
- Müller, J. (2021). Evaluation methods for citizen design science studies: How do planners and citizens obtain relevant information from map-based e-participation tools? ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(2), 0–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020048
- Önder, S. (2003). Selçuk Üniversitesi ögrencilerinin rekreasyonel egilim ve taleplerinin belirlenmesi üzerinde bir arastirma. S.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(32), 31–38.
- Sanches, M. G. & Frankel, L. (2010). Co-design in Public Spaces: an Interdisciplinary Approach to Street Furniture Development. Design and Complexity - DRS International Conference 2010, 7-9 July, Montreal, Canada, 7–9. http://www.designresearchsociety.org/docs-procs/DRS2010/PDF/105.pdf
- Sanders, E. B. (2005). Information, inspiration and co-creation. 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design.
- Sanders, E. B. & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 5–18.
- Serón Torrecilla, F. J. (2019). Citizen science design the role of product designers: A study case, insectivoros. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Towards a New Innovation Landscape, E and PDE 2019, September. https://doi.org/10.35199/epde2019.19
- Tomarchio, L., Hasler, S., Herthogs, P., Müller, J. & Tunçer, B. (2019). Using an online participation tool to collect. 2, 747–756.
- Tomarchio, L., Hasler, S., Herthogs, P., Müller, J., Tunçer, B. & He, P. (2019). Using an online participation tool to collect relevant data for urban design the construction of two participation exercices. Intelligent and Informed - Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2019, 2, 747–756.
- Topay, M. (2020). Evaluation of Bodrum Şevket Sabancı Park according to user requests. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.592632
- Trischler, J., Dietrich, T. & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2019). Co-design: from expert- to user-driven ideas in public service design. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1595–1619. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming our word: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. NY: United Nations.
- Verebes, T. (2015). Mass-Customised Cities. Architectural Design AD, 85(6).
Abstract
References
- Ardito, C., Buono, P., Costabile, M. F., Lanzilotti, R. & Piccinno, A. (2012). End users as co-designers of their own tools and products. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 23(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.11.005
- Dilaver, N., Küçükerman, Ö. & Hasırcı, D. (2022). User-centered approaches in conventional and autonomous truck design and future effects on environmental design. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(Special Issue), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1023350
- Erdem, N. (2022). Dirençli kent ve kompakt kent modelleri̇ni sürdürülebi̇li̇rli̇k çerçevesi̇nde değerlendi̇rmesi̇. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 10(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.1191672
- Gül, A., Keleş, E. & Zun, Ö. F. U. (2016). Recreational demand and trends in the campus students and lecturers of Süleyman Demirel University. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Architecture Sciences and Applications, 1(1), 26–43.
- Irwın, A. (1995). Citizen Science. Opticon1826, 10, 1–6.
- Klinsch, E. (2014). Research Collection. BRISK Binary Robust Invariant Scalable Keypoints, 2(6), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010025751
- Lu, H. & Schmitt, G. (2017). Human Computation and Crowdsourcing for Knowledge Elicitation in Citizen Design Science.
- Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Harvard-MIT Joint Center for Urban Studies Series.
- Mueller, J. & Lu, H. (2017). Designing with citizens : Challenges and evaluation methods for crowd-sourced urban layouts. CAID@ IJCAI, 34–39.
- Mueller, Johannes, Asada, S. & Tomarchio, L. (2020). Engaging the crowd: Lessons for outreach and tool design from a creative online participatory study. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 9(2), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2020040101.oa
- Mueller, Johannes, Lu, H., Chirkin, A., Klein, B. & Schmitt, G. (2018a). Citizen design science: A strategy for crowd- creative urban design. Cities, 72(August 2017), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018
- Müller, J. (2021). Evaluation methods for citizen design science studies: How do planners and citizens obtain relevant information from map-based e-participation tools? ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(2), 0–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020048
- Önder, S. (2003). Selçuk Üniversitesi ögrencilerinin rekreasyonel egilim ve taleplerinin belirlenmesi üzerinde bir arastirma. S.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(32), 31–38.
- Sanches, M. G. & Frankel, L. (2010). Co-design in Public Spaces: an Interdisciplinary Approach to Street Furniture Development. Design and Complexity - DRS International Conference 2010, 7-9 July, Montreal, Canada, 7–9. http://www.designresearchsociety.org/docs-procs/DRS2010/PDF/105.pdf
- Sanders, E. B. (2005). Information, inspiration and co-creation. 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design.
- Sanders, E. B. & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 5–18.
- Serón Torrecilla, F. J. (2019). Citizen science design the role of product designers: A study case, insectivoros. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Towards a New Innovation Landscape, E and PDE 2019, September. https://doi.org/10.35199/epde2019.19
- Tomarchio, L., Hasler, S., Herthogs, P., Müller, J. & Tunçer, B. (2019). Using an online participation tool to collect. 2, 747–756.
- Tomarchio, L., Hasler, S., Herthogs, P., Müller, J., Tunçer, B. & He, P. (2019). Using an online participation tool to collect relevant data for urban design the construction of two participation exercices. Intelligent and Informed - Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, CAADRIA 2019, 2, 747–756.
- Topay, M. (2020). Evaluation of Bodrum Şevket Sabancı Park according to user requests. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.592632
- Trischler, J., Dietrich, T. & Rundle-Thiele, S. (2019). Co-design: from expert- to user-driven ideas in public service design. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1595–1619. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming our word: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. NY: United Nations.
- Verebes, T. (2015). Mass-Customised Cities. Architectural Design AD, 85(6).
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Participation and Governance, Urban Design |
| Journal Section | Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 16, 2023 |
| Submission Date | October 20, 2023 |
| Acceptance Date | December 7, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
