Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Motivation Obstacles Survey for Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language: Study for Adaptation to Turkish

Year 2020, Volume: 15 Issue: 29, 186 - 203, 30.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.515725

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the scale developed by Kikushi and Sakai (2009) to identify the motivation barriers of Japanese students who learn English, and to determine the psychometric properties of the scale. Research’s study group consisted of 237 students enrolled in Aydın University TOMER in the academic year of 2017-2018. As result of the analyses conducted, scale reliability was deduced as Cronbach Alpha = 0.861. As result of the factor analysis, variables were grouped under 4 factors with a total explained variance of 49.61%. Cronbach Alpha values with respect to these factors were found as 0.77; 0.74; 0.75; and 0.72, respectively.  In light of these findings, it was concluded that Motivation Obstacles Survey for Learning Turkish as a Foreign Language is a valid and reliable scaling tool that could be used by researchers and teachers in the field of teaching Turkish as a foreign language.

References

  • Akbaba, S . (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 0 (13), 343-361. Aktan, S. (2012). Öğrencilerin akademik başarısı, özdüzenleme becerisi, motivasyonu ve öğretmenlerin öğretim stilleri arasında ilişki, Doktora Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Gu¬ilford Press, New York, USA.Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.Dörnyei, Z., 2001. Teaching and researching motivation. Longman, Harlow.
Ergür, D. O. (2002). Yabancı Dil Öğreniminde Motivasyon Kaynakları. Eğitim ve Bilim. Cilt 27, Sayı 126 (38-42)Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343-357. Froiland, J. M., & Oros, E. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 119–132. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.822964.Hidi, S. (2015). Revisiting the role of rewards in motivation and learning: Implications of neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015- 9307-5.Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An ıntroduction to structural equation modeling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10(12), 1625–1633. doi: 10.1038/nn2007.Karasar, N. (2000). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (10. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional- design theories and models: An overview of their current status içinde (ss.383-434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kikuchi, K., Sakai, H., 2009. Japanese learners’ demotivation to study English: A survey study. JALT Journal, 31/2, 183-204.Liu, Y. ve Hou, S. (2017). Potential reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement: A longitudinal study, School Psychology International, 1-18, sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0143034317710574 journals.sagepub.com/home/spiLussier, R. N. (1996). Human relations in organizations: a skill-building approach. Boston: Irwin. Mels G. (2006). “LISREL for Windows: Getting Started Guide”, http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/GSWLISREL.pdfSchumacker, R.E. and Lomax R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Taylor & Francis, 1-8.Senemoğlu, N., (2007). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gönül Matbaacılık. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3/6, 49-74.Şimşek Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidel, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education Inc. Boston. the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.Ulusoy, A. (2007). Güdülenme (Editör: Prof. Dr. Ayten Ulusoy, Eğitim psikolojisi kitabında bölüm), Ankara: Anı yayıncılık. Ushioda, E. (2011) Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives,Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24:3, 199-210, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2010.538701Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy – supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development, 76(2), 483–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x.Waltz, C. F, Strcikland, O. L. and Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 176-8.Wan, T. T. (2002). Evidence-based health care management: Multivariate modeling approaches. Springer: Netherlands.Wang, J. and Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using mplus: methods and applications. West Susex: John Wiley & Sons, 5-9.Zhang, Q., 2007. Teacher misbehaviors as learning demotivators in college classrooms: A cross-cultural investigation in China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Education 56, 209–227.

Türkçeyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenenlere Yönelik Motivasyon Engelleri Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması

Year 2020, Volume: 15 Issue: 29, 186 - 203, 30.06.2020
https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.515725

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kikushi ve Sakai
(2009) tarafından İngilizce öğrenen Japon öğrencilerin motivasyon engellerini
belirlemeye yönelik geliştirilen ölçeğin, yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğrenenlere
yönelik uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin tespit edilmesidir.
Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, 2017-2018 eğitim-öğretim yılında İstanbul Aydın
Üniversitesi Aydın TÖMER’de öğrenim gören 237 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Yapılan
analizler neticesinde ölçeğe ait güvenirlik katsayısı 0,861 olarak bulunmuştur.
Faktör analizi sonucunda değişkenler toplam açıklanan varyansı %49.61 olan 4
faktör altında toplanmıştır. Bu faktörlere ilişkin güvenirlik katsayıları
sırasıyla 0,77; 0, 74; 0,75; 0,72 olarak bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular ışığında,
Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğrenenlere Yönelik Motivasyon Engelleri Ölçeği’nin
yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretimi sahasında araştırmacılar ve öğreticiler
tarafından kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu
sonucuna varılmıştır.

References

  • Akbaba, S . (2006). Eğitimde motivasyon. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 0 (13), 343-361. Aktan, S. (2012). Öğrencilerin akademik başarısı, özdüzenleme becerisi, motivasyonu ve öğretmenlerin öğretim stilleri arasında ilişki, Doktora Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Gu¬ilford Press, New York, USA.Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.Dörnyei, Z., 2001. Teaching and researching motivation. Longman, Harlow.
Ergür, D. O. (2002). Yabancı Dil Öğreniminde Motivasyon Kaynakları. Eğitim ve Bilim. Cilt 27, Sayı 126 (38-42)Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343-357. Froiland, J. M., & Oros, E. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(2), 119–132. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.822964.Hidi, S. (2015). Revisiting the role of rewards in motivation and learning: Implications of neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 1–33. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015- 9307-5.Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.Hox, J. J., & Bechger, T. M. (1998). An ıntroduction to structural equation modeling. Family Science Review, 11, 354–373.Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10(12), 1625–1633. doi: 10.1038/nn2007.Karasar, N. (2000). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (10. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional- design theories and models: An overview of their current status içinde (ss.383-434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kikuchi, K., Sakai, H., 2009. Japanese learners’ demotivation to study English: A survey study. JALT Journal, 31/2, 183-204.Liu, Y. ve Hou, S. (2017). Potential reciprocal relationship between motivation and achievement: A longitudinal study, School Psychology International, 1-18, sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0143034317710574 journals.sagepub.com/home/spiLussier, R. N. (1996). Human relations in organizations: a skill-building approach. Boston: Irwin. Mels G. (2006). “LISREL for Windows: Getting Started Guide”, http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/GSWLISREL.pdfSchumacker, R.E. and Lomax R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Taylor & Francis, 1-8.Senemoğlu, N., (2007). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gönül Matbaacılık. Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3/6, 49-74.Şimşek Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, temel ilkeler ve lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Yayınları.Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidel, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education Inc. Boston. the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.Ulusoy, A. (2007). Güdülenme (Editör: Prof. Dr. Ayten Ulusoy, Eğitim psikolojisi kitabında bölüm), Ankara: Anı yayıncılık. Ushioda, E. (2011) Language learning motivation, self and identity: current theoretical perspectives,Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24:3, 199-210, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2010.538701Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the motivational impact of intrinsic versus extrinsic goal framing and autonomy – supportive versus internally controlling communication style on early adolescents’ academic achievement. Child Development, 76(2), 483–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00858.x.Waltz, C. F, Strcikland, O. L. and Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 176-8.Wan, T. T. (2002). Evidence-based health care management: Multivariate modeling approaches. Springer: Netherlands.Wang, J. and Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using mplus: methods and applications. West Susex: John Wiley & Sons, 5-9.Zhang, Q., 2007. Teacher misbehaviors as learning demotivators in college classrooms: A cross-cultural investigation in China, Germany, Japan, and the United States. Communication Education 56, 209–227.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hatice Altunkaya

Emrah Boylu

Publication Date June 30, 2020
Submission Date January 21, 2019
Acceptance Date April 28, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 15 Issue: 29

Cite

APA Altunkaya, H., & Boylu, E. (2020). Türkçeyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenenlere Yönelik Motivasyon Engelleri Ölçeği: Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(29), 186-203. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.515725