Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Pre-service Teachers' Environmental Literacy: The Role of STEM-Based Environmental Education with Microcontrollers

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5, 233 - 247, 01.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.84.10.5

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of STEM-based environmental education in which microcontroller sets are integrated on pre-service teachers' environmental literacy. The study was carried out with a one-group pretest-posttest weak experimental design. The sample of the study consisted of 31 pre-service teachers attending biology, science, and chemistry education departments. As the data collection tool, the environmental literacy scale including knowledge, attitude, behaviour and awareness dimensions was applied to the sample group as a pre-test and post-test. The study lasted for 11 weeks in total, including training on microcontroller sets, STEM-based environmental education and application of tests. During the environmental education, the participants were divided into groups of 4-5 and the studies were carried out with the station technique. In the stations, a research problem about air, water, soil, light and noise pollution was posed to the participants. They were expected to propose a solution using microcontroller sets. At the end of the research, a statistically significant difference was determined between the pre-test and post-test scores of the pre-service teachers from the environmental literacy scale. Accordingly, it was concluded that STEM-based environmental education improved pre-service teachers' environmental literacy. Based on these results, it is recommended that experimental/ quasi-experimental studies investigating the effectiveness of STEM-based environmental education and studies determining the advantages and disadvantages of STEM based environmental education using microcontroller sets should be carried out.

Destekleyen Kurum

Gazi University Scientific Research Projects Department

Proje Numarası

SYL-2021-6953

Kaynakça

  • Akilli, M., & Genc, M. (2015). Examination of middle school students’ sub-dimensions of environmental literacy in terms of various variables. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.87773 (doi:10.19126/suje.87773)
  • Artun, H., Uzunoz, A., & Akbas, Y. (2013). The evaluation of the factors affecting the levels of environmental literacy of social science prospective teachers. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 34(11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE467
  • Ayar, A., Cavas, P., & Gurcan, G. (2020). A study on the status of stem education research in Turkey. Van Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Education, 17(1), 823-854. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.751853
  • Benitti, F. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
  • Bozdogan, K., Sahinpinar, D., & Karatekin, E. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of educational research articles published in the field of environmental literacy. Turkish Studies – Educational Sciences, 18(1), 27-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.63833
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/75bbe8b13bf3f54ebd755333ffd8621e/1?cbl=34845&pq-origsite=gscholar
  • Candan-Helvaci, S. (2021). E→ STEM approach applications in environmental education. In S. Erten (Ed). Different perspectives on environmental education, (171-202). Retrieved from https://www.isres.org/estem-approach-applications-in-environmental-education-219-s.html
  • Candan-Helvaci, S. (2022). Investigation of the effect of preservice science teachers’ E→ STEM activity development processes on environmental awareness levels: Preservice science teachers’ E→ STEM activities. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 1767-1785. Retrieved from https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1069/510
  • Chunteng, L. (2004). Survey of primary and secondary school teachers’ teaching competence for environmental education in Xicheng district of Beijing. Chinese Education and Society, 37(4), 39-44. doi: 10.1080/10611932.2004.11031655
  • Calisici, S. (2018). FETEMM uygulamalarının 8.sınıf öğrencilerinin çevresel tutumlarına, bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına, problem çözme becerilerine ve fen başarılarına etkisi. [The effects of STEM applications on the environmental attitudes of the 8th year students, scientific creativity, problem solving skills and science achievements]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gazi University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Cepni, S. & Ormanci, U. (2018). Geleceğin dünyası [The world of the future]. In S. Cepni (Ed.). Kuramdan uygulamaya STEM+E+A eğitimi [From theory to practice STEM + E+A education]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Coskun, V., & Ozkaya, A. (2020). Engineering-oriented interdisciplinary collaborative STEM application and course syllabus in teacher education, Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 327–361. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.823328
  • Demir (2021). Doğada STEM etkinliklerinin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin çevresel tutumlarına, bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına, yansıtıcı düşünme becerilerine, STEM meslek alan ilgilerine ve tutumlarına etkisi. [The effect of STEM activities in nature on 7th grade students' environmental attitudes, scientific creativity, reflective thinking skills, STEM occupational interests and attitudes]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Graduate School of Education, Alanya.
  • Dogru, C. (2020). Atık malzemelerle yapılan STEM etkinliklerinin ortaokul öğrencilerinin çevresel farkındalık ve geri dönüşüm algısına etkisi. [The effect of STEM activities with waste materials on environmental awareness and recycling perception of secondary school students]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Erzincan.
  • Erbasan, O., & Erkol, M. (2020). Investigation of environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of primary school teachers. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(24), 2443-2471. Doi:10.26466/opus.619973
  • Eren, S. G. (2020). An intervention method for environmental literacy: A trainers workshop of lifelong learning, City Academy, 13(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.695408
  • Fraser, J., Gupta, R., Flinner, K., Rank, S., & Ardalan, N. (2013). Engaging young people in 21st-century community challenges: linking environmental education with science technology, engineering and mathematics, newknowledge report. Retrieved from https://ulinnovativeeducation.com/sites/default/files/files/ESTEM_Report.pdf
  • Guven, E., & Aydogdu, M. (2012). Development of environmental problems behaviour scale and determination of teacher candidates’ behaviour levels. Journal of Uludağ University Faculty of Education, 25(2), 573-590. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/153489
  • Helvaci, S. C., & Helvaci, I. (2019). An interdisciplinary environmental education approach: Determining the effects of E-STEM activity on environmental awareness. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 337-346. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070205
  • Hicks, D. & Holden, C. (1995). Exploring the future: A missing dimension in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 185-193. doi: 10.1080/1350462950010205
  • Kısoglu, M. (2009), Öğrenci merkezli öğretimin öğretmen adaylarinin çevre okuryazarliği düzeyine etkisinin araştirilmasi. [Investigation the effect of student centered instruction on prospective teachers' environmental literacy]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Atatürk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Erzurum.
  • Koculu, A. & Girgin, S. (2022). The effect of E-STEM education on students’ perceptions and engineering design process about environmental issues. World Journal of Education, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n6p49
  • Kulegel, S. (2020). Çevre eğitimine dayalı fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik temelli etkinliklerin özel yetenekli öğrencilerin 21. yüzyıl becerilerini geliştirmesine yönelik araştırma. [A research to improve the 21st century skills of gifted and talented students of environmental education-based science, technology, engineering, mathematics activities]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yildiz Technical University Graduate School of Science and Engineering. Istanbul.
  • Maurer, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2020) Modelling environmental literacy with environmental knowledge, values and (reported) behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 65(2020). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100863
  • Miles, D. A. (2017). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps. In Doctoral Student Workshop: Finding Research Gaps-Research Methods and Strategies. Dallas, Texas Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sanusi-Sani-Maimagani/post/What-is-a-research-gap-or-knowledge-gap-in-research-and-literature-Is-gap-explored-or-constructed-How-can-gap-in-research-be-identified/attachment/612e5570647f3906fc94fab2/AS%253A1062899850153985%25401630426480747/download/Miles2017.pdf&hl=tr&sa=T&oi=gsb-ggp&ct=res&cd=0&d=13779371646527719238&ei=pc2zZPLJPIekmwHGo5bwDw&scisig=ABFrs3zXPcXgAxD7SuWEpPKoHgDw
  • Ozcakir-Sumen, O., & Calisici H. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ mind maps and opinions on STEM education implemented in an environmental literacy course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2). 459-476. doi: 10.12738/estp.2016.2.0166
  • Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED348235.pdf
  • Sungur-Gul, K., Saylan-Kirmizigul, A., & Ates, H. (2022). Review of STEM education in primary and secondary education in Turkey. The Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), 13(1), 544-568. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.931501
  • Sahin, S. H., Unlu, E. & Unlu, S. (2016). Investigation of teacher candidates’ environmental literacy awareness level. Education Sciences 11(2). 82-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2016.11.2.1C0655
  • Tadena, M.T. G. & Salic-Hairulla, M. A. (2019). Raising environmental awareness through localbased environmental education in STEM lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference. Series, 1835. 1- 11. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012092
  • Teksoz, G., Sahin, E. & Ertepinar, H. (2010). Environmental literacy, pre-service teachers, and a sustainable future. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39. 307-320. Retrieved from http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/480-published.pdf
  • Unal, S. & Dimiski, E. (1998). UNESCO uluslararası çevre eğitim programına (IEEP) göre ortaöğretim çevre eğitimi için öğretmenlerin yetiştirilmesi. [Training of secondary education environmental education teachers according to UNESCO international environmental education programme (IEEP)]. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(10), 299-308. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2069
  • Unal, S. & Dimiski, E. (1999). UNESCO-UNEP himayesinde çevre eğitiminin gelişimi ve Türkiye’ de ortaöğretim çevre eğitimi. [Development of environmental education under the auspices of UNESCO-UNEP and secondary environmental education in Turkey]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education,, 17. 142-154. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-1117.html
  • Wahyuni, A.L.E., Arrohman, D.A., Wilujeng, I., Widowati, A., & Suyanta, S. (2022). Application of integrated STEM based student worksheet local potential of Pagar Alam tea plantation to improve students’ environmental literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1252–1257. doi:10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1260
  • Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (2001). Educational research: A guide to the process. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.
  • Widowati, C., Purwanto, A., & Akbar, Z. (2021). Problem-based learning integration in STEM education to improve environmental literation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(7), 374-381. Retrieved from https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/2836/2410
  • Winarni E. W., Karpudewan, M., Karyadi, B. & Gumono, G. (2022). Integrated PjBL-STEM in scientific literacy and environment attitude for elementary school. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 8(2), 43-50. doi: 10.20448/edu.v8i2.3873
  • Yildirim, B. (2021). Integration of STEM into environmental education: Preservice teachers’ opinions. Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 1(1), 50-57. Retrieved from http://jstei.com/index.php/jsti/article/view/5
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5, 233 - 247, 01.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.84.10.5

Öz

Proje Numarası

SYL-2021-6953

Kaynakça

  • Akilli, M., & Genc, M. (2015). Examination of middle school students’ sub-dimensions of environmental literacy in terms of various variables. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.87773 (doi:10.19126/suje.87773)
  • Artun, H., Uzunoz, A., & Akbas, Y. (2013). The evaluation of the factors affecting the levels of environmental literacy of social science prospective teachers. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 34(11), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE467
  • Ayar, A., Cavas, P., & Gurcan, G. (2020). A study on the status of stem education research in Turkey. Van Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Education, 17(1), 823-854. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.751853
  • Benitti, F. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
  • Bozdogan, K., Sahinpinar, D., & Karatekin, E. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of educational research articles published in the field of environmental literacy. Turkish Studies – Educational Sciences, 18(1), 27-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.63833
  • Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/openview/75bbe8b13bf3f54ebd755333ffd8621e/1?cbl=34845&pq-origsite=gscholar
  • Candan-Helvaci, S. (2021). E→ STEM approach applications in environmental education. In S. Erten (Ed). Different perspectives on environmental education, (171-202). Retrieved from https://www.isres.org/estem-approach-applications-in-environmental-education-219-s.html
  • Candan-Helvaci, S. (2022). Investigation of the effect of preservice science teachers’ E→ STEM activity development processes on environmental awareness levels: Preservice science teachers’ E→ STEM activities. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 1767-1785. Retrieved from https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1069/510
  • Chunteng, L. (2004). Survey of primary and secondary school teachers’ teaching competence for environmental education in Xicheng district of Beijing. Chinese Education and Society, 37(4), 39-44. doi: 10.1080/10611932.2004.11031655
  • Calisici, S. (2018). FETEMM uygulamalarının 8.sınıf öğrencilerinin çevresel tutumlarına, bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına, problem çözme becerilerine ve fen başarılarına etkisi. [The effects of STEM applications on the environmental attitudes of the 8th year students, scientific creativity, problem solving skills and science achievements]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gazi University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
  • Cepni, S. & Ormanci, U. (2018). Geleceğin dünyası [The world of the future]. In S. Cepni (Ed.). Kuramdan uygulamaya STEM+E+A eğitimi [From theory to practice STEM + E+A education]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Coskun, V., & Ozkaya, A. (2020). Engineering-oriented interdisciplinary collaborative STEM application and course syllabus in teacher education, Ihlara Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 327–361. https://doi.org/10.47479/ihead.823328
  • Demir (2021). Doğada STEM etkinliklerinin 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin çevresel tutumlarına, bilimsel yaratıcılıklarına, yansıtıcı düşünme becerilerine, STEM meslek alan ilgilerine ve tutumlarına etkisi. [The effect of STEM activities in nature on 7th grade students' environmental attitudes, scientific creativity, reflective thinking skills, STEM occupational interests and attitudes]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Graduate School of Education, Alanya.
  • Dogru, C. (2020). Atık malzemelerle yapılan STEM etkinliklerinin ortaokul öğrencilerinin çevresel farkındalık ve geri dönüşüm algısına etkisi. [The effect of STEM activities with waste materials on environmental awareness and recycling perception of secondary school students]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Erzincan Binali Yildirim University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Erzincan.
  • Erbasan, O., & Erkol, M. (2020). Investigation of environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of primary school teachers. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(24), 2443-2471. Doi:10.26466/opus.619973
  • Eren, S. G. (2020). An intervention method for environmental literacy: A trainers workshop of lifelong learning, City Academy, 13(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.695408
  • Fraser, J., Gupta, R., Flinner, K., Rank, S., & Ardalan, N. (2013). Engaging young people in 21st-century community challenges: linking environmental education with science technology, engineering and mathematics, newknowledge report. Retrieved from https://ulinnovativeeducation.com/sites/default/files/files/ESTEM_Report.pdf
  • Guven, E., & Aydogdu, M. (2012). Development of environmental problems behaviour scale and determination of teacher candidates’ behaviour levels. Journal of Uludağ University Faculty of Education, 25(2), 573-590. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/153489
  • Helvaci, S. C., & Helvaci, I. (2019). An interdisciplinary environmental education approach: Determining the effects of E-STEM activity on environmental awareness. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 337-346. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070205
  • Hicks, D. & Holden, C. (1995). Exploring the future: A missing dimension in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 185-193. doi: 10.1080/1350462950010205
  • Kısoglu, M. (2009), Öğrenci merkezli öğretimin öğretmen adaylarinin çevre okuryazarliği düzeyine etkisinin araştirilmasi. [Investigation the effect of student centered instruction on prospective teachers' environmental literacy]. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Atatürk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Erzurum.
  • Koculu, A. & Girgin, S. (2022). The effect of E-STEM education on students’ perceptions and engineering design process about environmental issues. World Journal of Education, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n6p49
  • Kulegel, S. (2020). Çevre eğitimine dayalı fen, teknoloji, mühendislik, matematik temelli etkinliklerin özel yetenekli öğrencilerin 21. yüzyıl becerilerini geliştirmesine yönelik araştırma. [A research to improve the 21st century skills of gifted and talented students of environmental education-based science, technology, engineering, mathematics activities]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Yildiz Technical University Graduate School of Science and Engineering. Istanbul.
  • Maurer, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2020) Modelling environmental literacy with environmental knowledge, values and (reported) behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 65(2020). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100863
  • Miles, D. A. (2017). A taxonomy of research gaps: Identifying and defining the seven research gaps. In Doctoral Student Workshop: Finding Research Gaps-Research Methods and Strategies. Dallas, Texas Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sanusi-Sani-Maimagani/post/What-is-a-research-gap-or-knowledge-gap-in-research-and-literature-Is-gap-explored-or-constructed-How-can-gap-in-research-be-identified/attachment/612e5570647f3906fc94fab2/AS%253A1062899850153985%25401630426480747/download/Miles2017.pdf&hl=tr&sa=T&oi=gsb-ggp&ct=res&cd=0&d=13779371646527719238&ei=pc2zZPLJPIekmwHGo5bwDw&scisig=ABFrs3zXPcXgAxD7SuWEpPKoHgDw
  • Ozcakir-Sumen, O., & Calisici H. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ mind maps and opinions on STEM education implemented in an environmental literacy course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(2). 459-476. doi: 10.12738/estp.2016.2.0166
  • Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED348235.pdf
  • Sungur-Gul, K., Saylan-Kirmizigul, A., & Ates, H. (2022). Review of STEM education in primary and secondary education in Turkey. The Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences (WAJES), 13(1), 544-568. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.931501
  • Sahin, S. H., Unlu, E. & Unlu, S. (2016). Investigation of teacher candidates’ environmental literacy awareness level. Education Sciences 11(2). 82-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2016.11.2.1C0655
  • Tadena, M.T. G. & Salic-Hairulla, M. A. (2019). Raising environmental awareness through localbased environmental education in STEM lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference. Series, 1835. 1- 11. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1835/1/012092
  • Teksoz, G., Sahin, E. & Ertepinar, H. (2010). Environmental literacy, pre-service teachers, and a sustainable future. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39. 307-320. Retrieved from http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/480-published.pdf
  • Unal, S. & Dimiski, E. (1998). UNESCO uluslararası çevre eğitim programına (IEEP) göre ortaöğretim çevre eğitimi için öğretmenlerin yetiştirilmesi. [Training of secondary education environmental education teachers according to UNESCO international environmental education programme (IEEP)]. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(10), 299-308. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2069
  • Unal, S. & Dimiski, E. (1999). UNESCO-UNEP himayesinde çevre eğitiminin gelişimi ve Türkiye’ de ortaöğretim çevre eğitimi. [Development of environmental education under the auspices of UNESCO-UNEP and secondary environmental education in Turkey]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education,, 17. 142-154. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/shw_artcl-1117.html
  • Wahyuni, A.L.E., Arrohman, D.A., Wilujeng, I., Widowati, A., & Suyanta, S. (2022). Application of integrated STEM based student worksheet local potential of Pagar Alam tea plantation to improve students’ environmental literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1252–1257. doi:10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1260
  • Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (2001). Educational research: A guide to the process. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.
  • Widowati, C., Purwanto, A., & Akbar, Z. (2021). Problem-based learning integration in STEM education to improve environmental literation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(7), 374-381. Retrieved from https://ijmmu.com/index.php/ijmmu/article/view/2836/2410
  • Winarni E. W., Karpudewan, M., Karyadi, B. & Gumono, G. (2022). Integrated PjBL-STEM in scientific literacy and environment attitude for elementary school. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 8(2), 43-50. doi: 10.20448/edu.v8i2.3873
  • Yildirim, B. (2021). Integration of STEM into environmental education: Preservice teachers’ opinions. Journal of STEM Teacher Institutes, 1(1), 50-57. Retrieved from http://jstei.com/index.php/jsti/article/view/5
Toplam 38 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim Psikolojisi
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Edanur Koçak 0000-0003-0491-7433

Ayşe Yalçın Çelik 0000-0002-0724-1355

Çelebi Uluyol 0000-0001-9774-0547

Proje Numarası SYL-2021-6953
Erken Görünüm Tarihi 22 Ağustos 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2023
Kabul Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 5

Kaynak Göster

APA Koçak, E., Yalçın Çelik, A., & Uluyol, Ç. (2023). Pre-service Teachers’ Environmental Literacy: The Role of STEM-Based Environmental Education with Microcontrollers. Participatory Educational Research, 10(5), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.84.10.5