Abstract
Telecom operators experience difficulties in applications such as virtual local area network (VLAN) management, bandwidth management and access management while providing intranet services in traditional networks. In this study, open network operating system (ONOS) based software defined network (SDN) platform is developed for intranet services in order to address these problems. The developed platform has been integrated onto an existing network and a new topology has been created. In this proposed topology, intranet network elements are connected to the new generation SDN switches instead of the legacy switches. The proposed solution has been tested on a live network. According to test results where the proposed SDN platform is compared with the traditional intranet network in a live network scenario under varying traffic load, the SDN based platform achieved very successful results in terms of latency, jitter, packet loss and flow setup times. Overall, the proposed SDN platform provides a good alternative to traditional solutions in large scale intranet networks, minimizing the workload spent by the operators in controlling the network, while achieving cost savings and eliminating vendor dependency.
Keywords
References
- [1] McKeown N., Anderson T., Balakrishnan H., Parulkar G., Peterson L., Rexford J., Shenker S., Turner J., “OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2): 69-77, (2008).
- [2] Bondkovskii A., Keeney J., van der Meer S., Weber S., “Qualitative comparison of open-source sdn controllers”, IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, 889-894, (2016).
- [3] Koponen T., Casado M., Gude N., Stribling J., Poutievski L., Zhu M., Ramanathan R., Iwata Y., Inoue H., Hama T., Shenker S., “Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks”, 9th Usenix Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 351-364, (2010).
- [4] Internet: Linux Foundation, The OpenDaylight Platform, https://www.opendaylight.org, 06.06.2020.
- [5] Internet: Open Network Operating System (ONOS), https://wiki.onosproject.org/display/ONOS/Wiki+Home, 20.05.2020.
- [6] Internet: https://sdxcentral.com/networking/sdn/ definitions/what-is-floodlight-controller/, 15.07.2020.
- [7] Internet: http://www.opencontrail.org/a-blueprint-for-building-the-opencontrail-community/, 18.07.2020.
- [8] Abdullah T., “Testing of floodlight controller with mininet in SDN topology”, ScienceRise, 5 (2): 68-73, (2014).
- [9] Yamei F., Qing L., Qi H., “Research and comparative analysis of performance test on SDN controller”, 2016 First IEEE International Conference on Computer Communication and the Internet (ICCCI), 207-210, (2016).
- [10] Suh D., Jang S., Han S., Pack S., Kim M. S., Kim T., Lim C. G., “Toward highly available and scalable software defined networks for service providers”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(4):100-107, (2017).
- [11] Mamushiane L., Lysko A., Dlamini S., “A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers”, 2018 Wireless Days (WD), 54-59, (2018).
- [12] Salman O., Elhajj I. H., Kayssi A., Chehab A., “SDN controllers: A comparative study”, Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 1-6, (2016).
- [13] Shah S. A., Faiz J., Farooq M., Shafi A., Mehdi S. A., “An architectural evaluation of SDN controllers”, IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), (2013).
- [14] Leenheer M. De, Tofigh T., Parulkar G., “Open and programmable metro networks”, Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition (OFC), Th1A.7, (2016).
- [15] Kumari A., Chandra J., Sairam A. S., “Optimizing flow setup time in software defined network”, 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS), 543-545, (2018).
Abstract
Telecom operators experience difficulties in applications such as virtual local area network (VLAN) management, bandwidth management and access management while providing intranet services in traditional networks. In this study, open network operating system (ONOS) based software defined network (SDN) platform is developed for intranet services in order to address these problems. The developed platform has been integrated onto an existing network and a new topology has been created. In this proposed topology, intranet network elements are connected to the new generation SDN switches instead of the legacy switches. The proposed solution has been tested on a live network. According to test results where the proposed SDN platform is compared with the traditional intranet network in a live network scenario under varying traffic load, the SDN based platform achieved very successful results in terms of latency, jitter, packet loss and flow setup times. Overall, the proposed SDN platform provides a good alternative to traditional solutions in large scale intranet networks, minimizing the workload spent by the operators in controlling the network, while achieving cost savings and eliminating vendor dependency.
Keywords
References
- [1] McKeown N., Anderson T., Balakrishnan H., Parulkar G., Peterson L., Rexford J., Shenker S., Turner J., “OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2): 69-77, (2008).
- [2] Bondkovskii A., Keeney J., van der Meer S., Weber S., “Qualitative comparison of open-source sdn controllers”, IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, 889-894, (2016).
- [3] Koponen T., Casado M., Gude N., Stribling J., Poutievski L., Zhu M., Ramanathan R., Iwata Y., Inoue H., Hama T., Shenker S., “Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks”, 9th Usenix Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 351-364, (2010).
- [4] Internet: Linux Foundation, The OpenDaylight Platform, https://www.opendaylight.org, 06.06.2020.
- [5] Internet: Open Network Operating System (ONOS), https://wiki.onosproject.org/display/ONOS/Wiki+Home, 20.05.2020.
- [6] Internet: https://sdxcentral.com/networking/sdn/ definitions/what-is-floodlight-controller/, 15.07.2020.
- [7] Internet: http://www.opencontrail.org/a-blueprint-for-building-the-opencontrail-community/, 18.07.2020.
- [8] Abdullah T., “Testing of floodlight controller with mininet in SDN topology”, ScienceRise, 5 (2): 68-73, (2014).
- [9] Yamei F., Qing L., Qi H., “Research and comparative analysis of performance test on SDN controller”, 2016 First IEEE International Conference on Computer Communication and the Internet (ICCCI), 207-210, (2016).
- [10] Suh D., Jang S., Han S., Pack S., Kim M. S., Kim T., Lim C. G., “Toward highly available and scalable software defined networks for service providers”, IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(4):100-107, (2017).
- [11] Mamushiane L., Lysko A., Dlamini S., “A comparative evaluation of the performance of popular SDN controllers”, 2018 Wireless Days (WD), 54-59, (2018).
- [12] Salman O., Elhajj I. H., Kayssi A., Chehab A., “SDN controllers: A comparative study”, Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 1-6, (2016).
- [13] Shah S. A., Faiz J., Farooq M., Shafi A., Mehdi S. A., “An architectural evaluation of SDN controllers”, IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), (2013).
- [14] Leenheer M. De, Tofigh T., Parulkar G., “Open and programmable metro networks”, Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibition (OFC), Th1A.7, (2016).
- [15] Kumari A., Chandra J., Sairam A. S., “Optimizing flow setup time in software defined network”, 10th International Conference on Communication Systems & Networks (COMSNETS), 543-545, (2018).
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Engineering |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | September 1, 2021 |
| Submission Date | August 7, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 24 Issue: 3 |
Cite
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.