Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Research on System Thinking / Sistem Düşüncesi ile İlgili Yapılan Eğitim Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi

Year 2023, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 126 - 145, 30.08.2023

Adnan Küçükoğlu Hasret Nuhoğlu Arzu Derya Taşçı

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1281742

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of educational research conducted on system thinking and examine the distribution of research by year, citation count, influential authors, journals, countries, institutions, collaborative authorship, co-citation authors, journal citation networks, and keywords used in the articles. This study was designed in the a descriptive review. The data obtained by scanning articles published in the field of educational research on system thinking in the Web of Science (WoS) database was analyzed using bibliometric analysis methods. The bibliometric analysis results show that the highest number of articles related to system thinking were published in 2022, and the most cited study was the article titled "Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms" published by Weintrop et al. in the "Journal of Science Education and Technology." It was found that the highest number of articles were published in the "International Journal of Science Education." In the WoS database, there were 717 authors who published educational research in the category of system thinking, and the most contributing authors were Assaraf, OBZ, Schechter, C., and Shaked, H. It is noteworthy that the Ben Gurion University contributed the most to the research, and the majority of research was conducted in the United States. When the VOSviewer data was analyzed within the context of collaborative authorship, the program found connections among 29 out of the 49 countries identified. The data for the co-occurring keywords analysis of articles in the category of educational research on system thinking were analyzed using the VOSviewer program, and a total of 858 different keywords were identified. When filtered for those that were used at least three times, 54 common keywords were identified.

Keywords

Education Educational research System thinking Bibliometric analysis

References

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957–983.
  • Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
  • Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021). Forty years of the journal of futures markets: a bibliometric overview. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(7), 1027-1054.
  • Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of systems thinking skills in the context of earth system Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
  • Ben‐Zvi‐Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2010). Four case studies, six years later: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1253-1280. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20383
  • Benson, T. A. (2007). Developing a systems thinking capacity in learners of all ages. Systems Thinking in Schools Program. https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/10.1.1.535.9175.pdf
  • Boersma, K., Waarlo, A. J., & Klaassen, K. (2011). The feasibility of systems thinking in biology Education. Journal of Biological Education, 45(4), 190-197.
  • Boyraz, D. (2022). IB okullarında okutulan Türkçe öykü kitaplarının sistem düşüncesi yaklaşımı ile incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25. Baskı). Pegem A.
  • Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895555
  • Chang, C. Y. (2001). Comparing the impacts of a problem-based computer-assisted instruction and the direct-interactive teaching method on student science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 147-153.
  • Cisneros, L., Ibanescu, M., Keen, C., Lobato-Calleros, O., & Niebla-Zatarain, J. (2018). Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: Mapping and analyzing authors’ networks. Scientometrics, 117(2), 919–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2889-1
  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  • Costello, W. (2001). Computer-based simulations as learning tools: changing student mental models of real-world dynamical systems. Creative Learning Exchange.
  • Çelik, C., Kaymakçı, G., & Can, Ş, (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on career development of gifted students. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1206389
  • Çelikten, A. (2022). Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı dersinde eğitimde sistem düşüncesi araçlarının kullanılmasının eser analizinde derin okumaya etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pattnaik, D., & Lim, W. M. (2021). A bibliometric retrospection of marketing from the lens of psychology: Insights from psychology & marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 38(5), 834-865. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21472
  • Elmas, R., Arslan, H. Ö., Pamuk, S., Pesman, H. ve Sözbilir, M. (2021). Fen eğitiminde yeni bir yaklaşım olarak sistemsel düşünme. Turkiye Kimya Dernegi Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Egitimi, 6(1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.37995/jotcsc.889340
  • Erkenekli, M. (2011). Bilimsel yöntemlerin tarihi ve sistem dinamiklerinin doğuşu. B. Çelik, M. Erkenekli, H. Şeşen ve M. Polat (Ed.) , Sistem dinamikleri içinde (1. baskı, ss. 1-41). Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655-674.
  • Feriver, Ş., Olgan, R., Teksöz, G., & Barth, M. (2019). Systems thinking skills of preschool children in early childhood education contexts from Turkey and Germany. Sustainability, 11(5), 1478.
  • Flood, R. L. (2010). The relationship of ‘systems thinking’to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9169-1
  • Forrester, J. W. (1992). Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 42-63.
  • Fullan, M. (2006). The future of Educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational change, 7(3), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-9003-9
  • Gilissen, M. G., Knippels, M. C. P., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Bringing systems thinking into the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1253-1280.
  • Grant, W. E. (1998). Ecology and natural resource management: reflections from a systems perspective. Ecological Modelling, 108(1-3), 67-76.
  • Gülüm, B. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of researches on values education in visual arts lesson. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1231517
  • Güzeller, C. O., & Çeliker, N. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of tourism research for the period 2007-2016. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research, 6(1), 1-22.
  • Hogan, K. (2000). Assessing students' systems reasoning in ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655731
  • Hmelo, C., Holton, D., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of Learning Sciences, 9, 247–298.
  • Hossain, N. U. I., Dayarathna, V. L., Nagahi, M., & Jaradat, R. (2020). Systems thinking: A review and bibliometric analysis. Systems, 8(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8030023
  • Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
  • Karagöz, B. ve Ardıç, İ. K. (2019). Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisinde yayımlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(2), 419-435.
  • Kaya, N., Ellez, A. M., & Ellez, N. (2019). The effect of system thınkıng approach on the envıronmental conscıousness of pre-school chıldren. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 6(5), 36-50.
  • Keynan, A., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Goldman, D. (2014). The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students’ ecological system thinking abilities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.012
  • Kılınç, B. (2022). Çevre sosyolojisi ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 205-227.
  • Koseoglu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F., & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 61, 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.10.006
  • Lannon-Kim, C. (1991). Revitalizing the schools: a systems thinking approach. The Systems Thinker, 2(5), 1-4.
  • Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word‐based, topic‐based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1973-1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22628
  • Lyneis, D. A., & Fox-Melanson, D. (2001, July). The challenge of infusing system dynamics into a K-8 curriculum [Paper presentation].19th International System Dynamics Society Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Maani K., & Maharraj V. (2004). Links between systems thinking and complex decision-making. System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.281
  • Mambrey, S., Timm, J., Landskron, J. J., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). The impact of system specifics on systems thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1632-1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21649
  • Mambrey, S., Schreiber, N., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Young students’ reasoning about ecosystems: The role of systems thinking, knowledge, conceptions, and representation. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x
  • Meadows, D. (2021). Sistemlerle düşünmek. (K. Bolay Özemre & E. Göktepe, Çev. Ed.). Pegem Akademi. (Çalışmanın orijinali 2013`te yayımlanmıştır)
  • Mehren, R., Rempfler, A., Buchholz, J., Hartig, J., & Ulrich-Riedhammer, E. M. (2018). System competence modelling: Theoretical foundation and empirical validation of a model involving natural, social, and human-environment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21436
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
  • Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2009). Evaluation of the middle school students' understanding level of basic system concepts. Elementary Education Online, 8(3). 866-882.
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2014). Evaluation of student models of current socio-scientific topics based on systems dynamics. Educational Sciences Theory Practice, 14(5), 1957-1975. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.5.2091
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2020). The effect of deduction and induction methods used in modelling current environmental issues with system dynamics approach in science education. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.7.7.1
  • Nguyen, N. C., Graham, D., Ross, H., Maani, K., & Bosch, O. (2012). Educating systems thinking for sustainability: Experience with a developing country. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1097
  • Ormancı, Ü., Çepni, S. ve Balım, A.G. (2018). Ortaokul 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin sistem düşünme becerilerine ilişkin durumlarının belirlenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE.2018.203
  • Pauna, V. H., Picone, F., Le Guyader, G., Buonocore, E., & Franzese, P. P. (2018). The scientific research on ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Questions, 29(3), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2018.022
  • Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 26(1), 19–33. http://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.432
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal Of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
  • Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic management journal, 25(10), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
  • Richmond, B. (1994). System dynamics/systems thinking: Let’s just get on with it. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3), 135-157.
  • Riess, W., & Mischo, C. (2010). Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902769946
  • Pieters, R., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161348
  • Rosenkränzer, F., Hörsch, C., Schuler, S., & Riess, W. (2017). Student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching systems thinking: Effects of different interventions. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1932-1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1362603
  • Schoen, L., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-century schools in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 22(1), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807311291
  • Senge, P. M. (2002). Beşinci Disiplin. (A. İldeniz & A. Doğukan, Çev. Ed.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları. (Çalışmanın orijinali 1990’ da yayımlanmıştır)
  • Sönmez, Ö. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of Educational research articles published in the field of social study Education based on Web of Science database. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.30.7.2
  • Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171
  • Stuntz, L. N., Lyneis, D. A., & Richardson, G. P. (2001, July). The future of system dynamics and learner-centered learning in K-12 Education [Paper presentation].19th International System Dynamics Society Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 23(2‐3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.366
  • Şahin, F. (2021). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının sistem düşünme düzeylerinin incelenmesi: Biyoçeşitlilik. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 176-200.
  • Şeref, İ., & Karagöz, B. (2019). An evaluation of turkish education academic field: bibliometric analysis based on web of Science database. Journal of Language Education and Research, 5(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.578224
  • Tabak, A., Sığrı, Ü., Polat, M., Şeşen, H., & Çelik, B. (2011). Yönetim bilimi açısından sistem teorisi. B. Çelik, M. Erkenekli, H. Şeşen ve M. Polat (Ed.), Sistem dinamikleri içinde (1. baskı, ss. 71-141). Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Tecim, V. (2004). Sistem yaklaşımı ve soft sistem düşüncesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 75-100.
  • Toprakçı, E. (2017). Sınıf yönetimi (3. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  • Tripto, J., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Amit, M. (2013). Mapping what they know: Concept maps as an effective tool for assessing students’ systems thinking. American Journal of Operations Research, 15(3), 245-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2013.31A022
  • Yeşiltaş, E., & Şeker, G. (2021). Sosyal medya ile ilgili yapılan eğitim araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizi. Journal of World Of Turks/Zeitschrift Für Die Welt Der Türken, 13(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.46291/ZfWT/130209
  • Verhoeff, R. P., Knippels, M.-C. P. J., Gilissen, M. G. R., & Boersma, K. T. (2018). The theoretical nature of systems thinking. Perspectives on systems thinking in biology Education. Frontiers in Education, 3, 518–560. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00040
  • Waters Foundation, (2006). Systems thinking in schools: a Water Foundation Project. www.watersfoundation.org.
  • Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and Science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and technology, 25, 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
  • Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811456262

Sistem Düşüncesi ile İlgili Yapılan Eğitim Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi / Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Research on System Thinking

Year 2023, Volume: 14 Issue: 4, 126 - 145, 30.08.2023

Adnan Küçükoğlu Hasret Nuhoğlu Arzu Derya Taşçı

https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1281742

Abstract

Bu çalışma, sistem düşüncesi ile ilgili yapılan eğitim araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizini yaparak, bu alandaki araştırmaların yıllara göre dağılımını, atıf sayısını, alana katkı sağlayan yazarlarını, etkili dergileri, etkili ülkeleri, etkili kurumları, ortak yazarlık işbirliklerini, ortak atıf yazarlarını, dergilerin atıf ağlarını ve makalelerde kullanılan anahtar kelimeleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma betimsel tarama modelinde tasarlanmıştır. Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında sistem düşüncesi ile ilgili eğitim araştırmaları kapsamında yayınlanan makalelerin taranması sonucu elde edilen veriler bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Bibliyometrik analiz sonuçları sistem düşüncesi ile ilgili en fazla makalenin 2022 yılında yayınlandığını, en çok atıf alan çalışmanın “Journal Of Scıence Educatıon And Technology” dergisinde Weintrop vd., tarafından yayınlanan “Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms” başlıklı makale olduğu, en fazla makalenin “International Journal of Science Education” dergisinde yayımlandığını ortaya koymaktadır. WoS veri tabanında sistem düşüncesi alanında eğitim araştırmaları kategorisinde yayın yapan 717 yazar bulunduğu ve en fazla katkı sağlayan yazarların sırasıyla Assaraf, OBZ, Schechter, C. ve Shaked, H. olduğu tespit edilmiştir. En fazla çalışmanın yayınlandığı kurumun Ben Gurion Üniversitesi olduğu ve en çok yayının Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’ nde yapıldığı dikkat çekmektedir. VOSwiever verileri ülkelerin ortak yazarlık iş birliği çerçevesinde incelendiğinde program 49 ülke tespit etmiş ve bu ülkelerden 29’ u arasında bağlantı gücü saptamıştır. Sistem düşüncesi ile ilgili eğitim araştırmaları kategorisindeki makalelerin ortak anahtar kelime analizi için veriler VOSviewer programı aracılığıyla analiz edilmiş ve toplam 858 tane farklı anahtar kelime saptanmıştır. En az 3 kez kullanılmış olma şeklinde filitreleme yapıldığında 54 ortak kelimenin ortaya çıktığı görülmüştür.

Keywords

Eğitim Eğitim araştırmaları Sistem düşüncesi Bibliyometrik analiz

References

  • Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957–983.
  • Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2015). A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach. Procedia Computer Science, 44, 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
  • Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2021). Forty years of the journal of futures markets: a bibliometric overview. Journal of Futures Markets, 41(7), 1027-1054.
  • Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of systems thinking skills in the context of earth system Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 518–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20061
  • Ben‐Zvi‐Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2010). Four case studies, six years later: Developing system thinking skills in junior high school and sustaining them over time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1253-1280. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20383
  • Benson, T. A. (2007). Developing a systems thinking capacity in learners of all ages. Systems Thinking in Schools Program. https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/10.1.1.535.9175.pdf
  • Boersma, K., Waarlo, A. J., & Klaassen, K. (2011). The feasibility of systems thinking in biology Education. Journal of Biological Education, 45(4), 190-197.
  • Boyraz, D. (2022). IB okullarında okutulan Türkçe öykü kitaplarının sistem düşüncesi yaklaşımı ile incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (25. Baskı). Pegem A.
  • Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895555
  • Chang, C. Y. (2001). Comparing the impacts of a problem-based computer-assisted instruction and the direct-interactive teaching method on student science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 147-153.
  • Cisneros, L., Ibanescu, M., Keen, C., Lobato-Calleros, O., & Niebla-Zatarain, J. (2018). Bibliometric study of family business succession between 1939 and 2017: Mapping and analyzing authors’ networks. Scientometrics, 117(2), 919–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2889-1
  • Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
  • Costello, W. (2001). Computer-based simulations as learning tools: changing student mental models of real-world dynamical systems. Creative Learning Exchange.
  • Çelik, C., Kaymakçı, G., & Can, Ş, (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on career development of gifted students. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1206389
  • Çelikten, A. (2022). Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı dersinde eğitimde sistem düşüncesi araçlarının kullanılmasının eser analizinde derin okumaya etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Maltepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pattnaik, D., & Lim, W. M. (2021). A bibliometric retrospection of marketing from the lens of psychology: Insights from psychology & marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 38(5), 834-865. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21472
  • Elmas, R., Arslan, H. Ö., Pamuk, S., Pesman, H. ve Sözbilir, M. (2021). Fen eğitiminde yeni bir yaklaşım olarak sistemsel düşünme. Turkiye Kimya Dernegi Dergisi Kısım C: Kimya Egitimi, 6(1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.37995/jotcsc.889340
  • Erkenekli, M. (2011). Bilimsel yöntemlerin tarihi ve sistem dinamiklerinin doğuşu. B. Çelik, M. Erkenekli, H. Şeşen ve M. Polat (Ed.) , Sistem dinamikleri içinde (1. baskı, ss. 1-41). Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Evagorou, M., Korfiatis, K., Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2009). An investigation of the potential of interactive simulations for developing system thinking skills in elementary school: A case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 655-674.
  • Feriver, Ş., Olgan, R., Teksöz, G., & Barth, M. (2019). Systems thinking skills of preschool children in early childhood education contexts from Turkey and Germany. Sustainability, 11(5), 1478.
  • Flood, R. L. (2010). The relationship of ‘systems thinking’to action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9169-1
  • Forrester, J. W. (1992). Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling. European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 42-63.
  • Fullan, M. (2006). The future of Educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational change, 7(3), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-9003-9
  • Gilissen, M. G., Knippels, M. C. P., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2020). Bringing systems thinking into the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1253-1280.
  • Grant, W. E. (1998). Ecology and natural resource management: reflections from a systems perspective. Ecological Modelling, 108(1-3), 67-76.
  • Gülüm, B. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of researches on values education in visual arts lesson. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14(2), 350-365. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1231517
  • Güzeller, C. O., & Çeliker, N. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of tourism research for the period 2007-2016. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research, 6(1), 1-22.
  • Hogan, K. (2000). Assessing students' systems reasoning in ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655731
  • Hmelo, C., Holton, D., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of Learning Sciences, 9, 247–298.
  • Hossain, N. U. I., Dayarathna, V. L., Nagahi, M., & Jaradat, R. (2020). Systems thinking: A review and bibliometric analysis. Systems, 8(3), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems8030023
  • Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
  • Karagöz, B. ve Ardıç, İ. K. (2019). Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisinde yayımlanan makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(2), 419-435.
  • Kaya, N., Ellez, A. M., & Ellez, N. (2019). The effect of system thınkıng approach on the envıronmental conscıousness of pre-school chıldren. Route Educational and Social Science Journal, 6(5), 36-50.
  • Keynan, A., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Goldman, D. (2014). The repertory grid as a tool for evaluating the development of students’ ecological system thinking abilities. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.012
  • Kılınç, B. (2022). Çevre sosyolojisi ile ilgili yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(1), 205-227.
  • Koseoglu, M. A., Rahimi, R., Okumus, F., & Liu, J. (2016). Bibliometric studies in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 61, 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2016.10.006
  • Lannon-Kim, C. (1991). Revitalizing the schools: a systems thinking approach. The Systems Thinker, 2(5), 1-4.
  • Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring author research relatedness: A comparison of word‐based, topic‐based, and author cocitation approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1973-1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22628
  • Lyneis, D. A., & Fox-Melanson, D. (2001, July). The challenge of infusing system dynamics into a K-8 curriculum [Paper presentation].19th International System Dynamics Society Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Maani K., & Maharraj V. (2004). Links between systems thinking and complex decision-making. System Dynamics Review, 20(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.281
  • Mambrey, S., Timm, J., Landskron, J. J., & Schmiemann, P. (2020). The impact of system specifics on systems thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1632-1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21649
  • Mambrey, S., Schreiber, N., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Young students’ reasoning about ecosystems: The role of systems thinking, knowledge, conceptions, and representation. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09917-x
  • Meadows, D. (2021). Sistemlerle düşünmek. (K. Bolay Özemre & E. Göktepe, Çev. Ed.). Pegem Akademi. (Çalışmanın orijinali 2013`te yayımlanmıştır)
  • Mehren, R., Rempfler, A., Buchholz, J., Hartig, J., & Ulrich-Riedhammer, E. M. (2018). System competence modelling: Theoretical foundation and empirical validation of a model involving natural, social, and human-environment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21436
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
  • Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2009). Evaluation of the middle school students' understanding level of basic system concepts. Elementary Education Online, 8(3). 866-882.
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2014). Evaluation of student models of current socio-scientific topics based on systems dynamics. Educational Sciences Theory Practice, 14(5), 1957-1975. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.5.2091
  • Nuhoğlu, H. (2020). The effect of deduction and induction methods used in modelling current environmental issues with system dynamics approach in science education. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.7.7.1
  • Nguyen, N. C., Graham, D., Ross, H., Maani, K., & Bosch, O. (2012). Educating systems thinking for sustainability: Experience with a developing country. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1097
  • Ormancı, Ü., Çepni, S. ve Balım, A.G. (2018). Ortaokul 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin sistem düşünme becerilerine ilişkin durumlarının belirlenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE.2018.203
  • Pauna, V. H., Picone, F., Le Guyader, G., Buonocore, E., & Franzese, P. P. (2018). The scientific research on ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Questions, 29(3), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2018.022
  • Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 26(1), 19–33. http://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.432
  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal Of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
  • Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic management journal, 25(10), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
  • Richmond, B. (1994). System dynamics/systems thinking: Let’s just get on with it. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3), 135-157.
  • Riess, W., & Mischo, C. (2010). Promoting systems thinking through biology lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902769946
  • Pieters, R., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161348
  • Rosenkränzer, F., Hörsch, C., Schuler, S., & Riess, W. (2017). Student teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching systems thinking: Effects of different interventions. International Journal of Science Education, 39(14), 1932-1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1362603
  • Schoen, L., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-century schools in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 22(1), 181-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807311291
  • Senge, P. M. (2002). Beşinci Disiplin. (A. İldeniz & A. Doğukan, Çev. Ed.). Yapı Kredi Yayınları. (Çalışmanın orijinali 1990’ da yayımlanmıştır)
  • Sönmez, Ö. F. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of Educational research articles published in the field of social study Education based on Web of Science database. Participatory Educational Research, 7(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.30.7.2
  • Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171
  • Stuntz, L. N., Lyneis, D. A., & Richardson, G. P. (2001, July). The future of system dynamics and learner-centered learning in K-12 Education [Paper presentation].19th International System Dynamics Society Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 23(2‐3), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.366
  • Şahin, F. (2021). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının sistem düşünme düzeylerinin incelenmesi: Biyoçeşitlilik. Türkiye Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 176-200.
  • Şeref, İ., & Karagöz, B. (2019). An evaluation of turkish education academic field: bibliometric analysis based on web of Science database. Journal of Language Education and Research, 5(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.578224
  • Tabak, A., Sığrı, Ü., Polat, M., Şeşen, H., & Çelik, B. (2011). Yönetim bilimi açısından sistem teorisi. B. Çelik, M. Erkenekli, H. Şeşen ve M. Polat (Ed.), Sistem dinamikleri içinde (1. baskı, ss. 71-141). Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Tecim, V. (2004). Sistem yaklaşımı ve soft sistem düşüncesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 75-100.
  • Toprakçı, E. (2017). Sınıf yönetimi (3. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  • Tripto, J., Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Amit, M. (2013). Mapping what they know: Concept maps as an effective tool for assessing students’ systems thinking. American Journal of Operations Research, 15(3), 245-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2013.31A022
  • Yeşiltaş, E., & Şeker, G. (2021). Sosyal medya ile ilgili yapılan eğitim araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizi. Journal of World Of Turks/Zeitschrift Für Die Welt Der Türken, 13(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.46291/ZfWT/130209
  • Verhoeff, R. P., Knippels, M.-C. P. J., Gilissen, M. G. R., & Boersma, K. T. (2018). The theoretical nature of systems thinking. Perspectives on systems thinking in biology Education. Frontiers in Education, 3, 518–560. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00040
  • Waters Foundation, (2006). Systems thinking in schools: a Water Foundation Project. www.watersfoundation.org.
  • Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and Science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and technology, 25, 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
  • Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811456262
There are 78 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Educational Sciences and Sciences of Field Education
Authors

Adnan Küçükoğlu 0000-0002-8522-258X

Hasret Nuhoğlu 0000-0002-9985-4203

Arzu Derya Taşçı 0000-0003-3667-2020

Publication Date August 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023Volume: 14 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Küçükoğlu, A., Nuhoğlu, H., & Derya Taşçı, A. (2023). Sistem Düşüncesi ile İlgili Yapılan Eğitim Araştırmalarının Bibliyometrik Analizi / Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Research on System Thinking. E-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(4), 126-145. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1281742
 Download Cover Image

Creative Commons Lisansı
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)


[email protected]                http://www.e-ijer.com    Address: Ege University Faculty of Education İzmir/Türkiye