Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ERKEĞİN KADINA YÖNELİK ŞİDDETE BAKIŞI VE TUTUMU

Year 2013, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 147 - 152, 31.12.2013

Abstract

GİRİŞ: Kadına yönelik şiddet türlerinin en sık görülen şekli, eşler ve partnerler tarafından şiddet uygulanmasıdır.


MATERYAL VE METOD: Bu çalışma, Erkeğin kadına yönelik şiddete bakışını belirlemek amacıyla tanımlayıcı olarak yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini, Türkiye’nin İç Anadolu Bölgesinde bulunan Kırşehir İli Bağbaşı Mahallesi’nde yaşayan 133 evli erkek oluşturmuştur. Evrenin tümü örnekleme alınmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak, literatürden yararlanılarak araştırmacılar tarafından oluşturulan soru formu kullanılmıştır. Soru formları erkeklerle yüz yüze görüşerek uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde yüzdelik kullanılmıştır.



BULGULAR: Çalışma kapsamına alınan erkeklerin yaş ortalamasının 39.12±11.12 olduğu saptanmıştır. Erkeklerin %40,6’sının eşlerine şiddet uyguladığı ve kadına şiddetin evliliğin ilk yıllarında %33,1 başladığı belirlenmiştir. Erkeklere göre şiddet nedenleri değerlendirildiğinde, %12,8’i sinirlilik olarak görmektedir. Erkeklerin çoğunun (%97,7) şiddet konusunda eğitim almadıkları belirlenmiştir. Erkeklerin şiddet türlerini bilme durumu değerlendirildiğinde ise %42,9’unun fiziksel şiddeti bildiği belirlenmiştir.


SONUÇ VE ÖNERİLER: Çalışma sonucunda; erkeklerin önemli bir kısmının kadınlara şiddet uyguladığı, erkeklerin şiddeti daha çok fiziksel şiddet olarak değerlendikleri ve yine çoğunun ise şiddet konusunda herhangi bir bilgi almadıkları ve bilgilerinin olmadığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Erkeklerin şiddetin türleri konusunda eğitim yolu ile bilinçlendirilmesi önerilmektedir.


References

  • 1. Watts C, Zimmerman C. Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. Lancet 2002;359:1232–7.
  • 2. Heise LL, Raikes A, Watts CH, et al. Violence against women: A neglected public health issue in less developed countries. Soc Sci. Med 1994;39(9):1165–79.
  • 3. Krug E, Dahlberg L, MercyJ, Zwi A, Lozano R. World Health Organization. World Report on Violence and Health: Summary.Geneva, 2002.
  • 4. Gökkaya VB. Economical violence against the women in Turkey. C.Ü. Economics and Administrative Science Journal 2011; 12(2):101-112.
  • 5. Güler T, Tel H, Tuncay FÖ. Women view to the violence in family. C.Ü. Medicine Faculty Journal 2005; 27(2): 51-56.
  • 6. Şahin EM, Yetim D, Öyekçin DG. Prevalence of husband violence against women and women attitudes in Edirne. Cumhuriyet Medicine Journal 2012; 34:23-32.
  • 7. Pınar G, Pınar T. The view of university students about the violence against women. Health and Society. 2007; 17(2):76-83.
  • 8. Yaman Efe Ş, Ayaz S. Violence against women and their view . Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2010; 11:23-29.
  • 9. Ulutaşdemir N. Violence against women. Health and Society 2002; 12(4):15-20.
  • 10. Tanrıverdi G, Şıpkın S. In Çanakkale, educational level of the women who Consult Health Center. Fırat Medicine Journal 2008; 13(3):183-187.
  • 11. T.C.Presidency of Family Research Association(2000). The Reasons and Results of Violence in Family. Ankara.
  • 12. Fikree F.F, Razzak J.A, Durocher j. Attitudes of Pakistani men to domestic violence: a study from Karachi, Pakistan. JHMG 2005; 2(1):49-58.
  • 13. Page A.Z, İnce M. A Compilation about the violence in family. Turkish Psychology Essays 2008; 11 (22): 81-94.
  • 14. Gage AJ, Hutchinson PL. Power, control, and intimate partner sexual violence in Haiti. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(1):11-24
  • 15. Arıkan Ç. Poverty, Lack of Harmony, Divorce. Ankara: şafak Printery (page AZ)
  • 16. Vung ND, Ostergren PO, Krantz G. Intimate partner violence against women in rural Vietnam: different socio-demographic factors are associated with different forms of violence. Need for new intervention guidelines? BMC Public Health. 2008; 8(1):55.
  • 17. Ellsberg MC, Peña R, Herrera A, Liljestrand J, Winkvist A.Wife abuse among women of childbearing age in Nicaragua. Am J Public Health 1999; 89:241-4.
  • 18. Choi SY, Ting KF. Wife beating in South Africa: an imbalance theory of resources and power. J Interpers Violence. 2008; 23(6):834-52.
  • 19. Parish WL, Wang T, Laumann EO, Pan S, Luo Y. Intimate partner violence in China: national prevalence, risk factors and associated health problems. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004;30(4):174-81.
  • 20. Peek Asa C, Zwerling C, Young T, Stromquist AM, Burmeister LF, Merchant JA. A population based study of reporting patterns and characteristics of men who abuse their female partners. Inj Prev. 2005; 11(3):180-5.
  • 21. Dönmez G. Determing The Existence of Violence and its Types and Factors Among the Married Men.İzmir, Dokuz Eylül University, Medicine Faculty Society Health Department Branch Thesis,2008.
  • 22. Yağbasan M, Ustakara F. The study of determining the communication in coffeehouse in Turkish Society (Example of Gaziantep). Fırat University Social Science Journal 2008; 18(1):233-260.

MAN’S VIEW TOWARDS VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

Year 2013, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 147 - 152, 31.12.2013

Abstract


OBJECTIVE: The most common forms of violence against women is engaging in violence by spouses and partners.



MATERİAL AND METHOD: This study was carried out as a descriptive for determine the man’s view of violence against women. The population of there search constitudes 133 married men who live Bağbaşı neighborhood of Kırşehir, in Central Anatolia Region of Turkey. All of thepopulation have been sampled. As a means of data collection, a questionnare was used prepared by the researchers benefitting from literature. Questionnare sapplied by meeting men face to face. Percentile was used in analyzing of the data.


FİNDİNGS: It is determined that average age of the men included in the study is 39.12±11.12. It is indicated that 40,6% of men perpetrate violence to their wive sand violence against women started 33,1% during the first years of marriage. When the causes of violence considered for men, 12,8% is seen as nervousness. It is defined that most of the men (97,7%) have not raining on violence. When the knowledge of men about types of violence considered, 42,9% of them are aware of physical knowledge.


CONCLUSİON AND RECOMMENDATİONS: In the result of this study, it is concluded that a significant portion of men being violent against women, men consider violence mostly as physical violence, and stil have not receive dany information about the violence, and have noinformation. It is recomended that men should be made concious about the types of violence through education.


References

  • 1. Watts C, Zimmerman C. Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. Lancet 2002;359:1232–7.
  • 2. Heise LL, Raikes A, Watts CH, et al. Violence against women: A neglected public health issue in less developed countries. Soc Sci. Med 1994;39(9):1165–79.
  • 3. Krug E, Dahlberg L, MercyJ, Zwi A, Lozano R. World Health Organization. World Report on Violence and Health: Summary.Geneva, 2002.
  • 4. Gökkaya VB. Economical violence against the women in Turkey. C.Ü. Economics and Administrative Science Journal 2011; 12(2):101-112.
  • 5. Güler T, Tel H, Tuncay FÖ. Women view to the violence in family. C.Ü. Medicine Faculty Journal 2005; 27(2): 51-56.
  • 6. Şahin EM, Yetim D, Öyekçin DG. Prevalence of husband violence against women and women attitudes in Edirne. Cumhuriyet Medicine Journal 2012; 34:23-32.
  • 7. Pınar G, Pınar T. The view of university students about the violence against women. Health and Society. 2007; 17(2):76-83.
  • 8. Yaman Efe Ş, Ayaz S. Violence against women and their view . Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry 2010; 11:23-29.
  • 9. Ulutaşdemir N. Violence against women. Health and Society 2002; 12(4):15-20.
  • 10. Tanrıverdi G, Şıpkın S. In Çanakkale, educational level of the women who Consult Health Center. Fırat Medicine Journal 2008; 13(3):183-187.
  • 11. T.C.Presidency of Family Research Association(2000). The Reasons and Results of Violence in Family. Ankara.
  • 12. Fikree F.F, Razzak J.A, Durocher j. Attitudes of Pakistani men to domestic violence: a study from Karachi, Pakistan. JHMG 2005; 2(1):49-58.
  • 13. Page A.Z, İnce M. A Compilation about the violence in family. Turkish Psychology Essays 2008; 11 (22): 81-94.
  • 14. Gage AJ, Hutchinson PL. Power, control, and intimate partner sexual violence in Haiti. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(1):11-24
  • 15. Arıkan Ç. Poverty, Lack of Harmony, Divorce. Ankara: şafak Printery (page AZ)
  • 16. Vung ND, Ostergren PO, Krantz G. Intimate partner violence against women in rural Vietnam: different socio-demographic factors are associated with different forms of violence. Need for new intervention guidelines? BMC Public Health. 2008; 8(1):55.
  • 17. Ellsberg MC, Peña R, Herrera A, Liljestrand J, Winkvist A.Wife abuse among women of childbearing age in Nicaragua. Am J Public Health 1999; 89:241-4.
  • 18. Choi SY, Ting KF. Wife beating in South Africa: an imbalance theory of resources and power. J Interpers Violence. 2008; 23(6):834-52.
  • 19. Parish WL, Wang T, Laumann EO, Pan S, Luo Y. Intimate partner violence in China: national prevalence, risk factors and associated health problems. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2004;30(4):174-81.
  • 20. Peek Asa C, Zwerling C, Young T, Stromquist AM, Burmeister LF, Merchant JA. A population based study of reporting patterns and characteristics of men who abuse their female partners. Inj Prev. 2005; 11(3):180-5.
  • 21. Dönmez G. Determing The Existence of Violence and its Types and Factors Among the Married Men.İzmir, Dokuz Eylül University, Medicine Faculty Society Health Department Branch Thesis,2008.
  • 22. Yağbasan M, Ustakara F. The study of determining the communication in coffeehouse in Turkish Society (Example of Gaziantep). Fırat University Social Science Journal 2008; 18(1):233-260.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

A Gökçe Demir

Gizem Deniz Bulucu This is me

Ayşegül Özcan This is me

Publication Date December 31, 2013
Submission Date May 17, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 2 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Demir, A. G., Bulucu, G. D., & Özcan, A. (2013). ERKEĞİN KADINA YÖNELİK ŞİDDETE BAKIŞI VE TUTUMU. Balıkesir Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(3), 147-152.

International Peer Reviewed Journal

The journal adopts Open Access Policy and does not request article proccessing charge (APC), article publishing charge or any other charges.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.